Masamichi Imamura vs Carl Emil Overbeck Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 24 Nov at 02:12 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Imamura vs C. Emil Overbeck

JPN
0
Win
Played
1
Win

DEN
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Imamura 0 - 1 Overbeck
They have played 3 sets in total, with Masamichi Imamura winning 1 and Carl Emil Overbeck winning 2. The last match between Carl Emil Overbeck and Masamichi Imamura was at the Playford Challenger, 24-11-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Carl Emil Overbeck getting the victory 6-4 5-7 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Imamura | 0 |
| Overbeck | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) Playford Challenger(11-24-25)
M. Imamura vs C. E. Overbeck H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 57.19% (167-125) | Career Total W/L | 65.85% (54-28) |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Imamura vs C. E. Overbeck Match Preview:
- Carl Emil Overbeck has averaged 41.54% success on second serves in the past six months; Masamichi Imamura slightly outperforms him with 44.00%. Could Imamura's slight edge here translate into a match-winning advantage?
- When returning second serves, Overbeck has a slight lead, winning 44.62% of these points compared to Imamura's 43.61%. How much could this influence the match outcome?
- For first serve returns, Imamura has a marginal advantage with 27.56% success against Overbeck's 27.20%. Could this be a decisive factor?
- In breakpoint situations, Imamura narrowly surpasses Overbeck, saving 51.13% of the time compared to Overbeck's 51.00%. Does this suggest a mental edge under pressure?
- Looking at win percentages over the last year, Overbeck has been more successful with 67.44% wins versus Imamura's 43.10%. Does this record make Overbeck the favorite for the match?
- On Hard courts, Overbeck has an impressive win ratio of 74%, matching Imamura's best surface performance on Indoor Hard courts at 74%. With both excelling on favored surfaces, could the surface play a critical role?
- Overbeck's match experience comes mostly from ITF $10K tournaments with a win rate of 65.63%, while Imamura's experience is primarily from higher-level Challenger events, though his win rate is just 39.47%. How important is the differing event experience in predicting the match winner?
- Overbeck has faced marginally tougher competition, with opponents ranked an average of 391.42 compared to Imamura's 402.4. Will this experience against stronger opponents benefit Overbeck in the match?
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Overbeck may have the upper hand, having won 57% of these sets compared to Imamura's 40%. Could this stat be a predictor of resilience and final match outcome?
- Converting breakpoints is another factor, with Overbeck achieving 35.90% conversion compared to Imamura’s 33.11%. Will this stat prove pivotal in tight match moments?
Editorial Prediction (November 24, 2025, UTC):
In this upcoming tennis match, Carl Emil Overbeck has shown a consistent edge across multiple performance metrics. His superior win rate over the last year, coupled with a high percentage of victories in deciding sets, suggests a greater capacity to perform under pressure.
While Masamichi Imamura holds a slight edge in second serve performance, other areas such as return statistics and breakpoint conversion slightly favor Overbeck. Additionally, Overbeck's ability to convert breakpoints and his experience facing tougher opponents may equip him better for this encounter.
Considering these factors, Carl Emil Overbeck appears more likely to emerge victorious in this match.
Masamichi Imamura vs Carl Emil Overbeck Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Imamura vs C. E. Overbeck H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 12 | Games Won | 17 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:58:49 | Average Match Time | 1:58:49 |
| 65% (68/104) | 1st Serve % | 56% (53/94) |
| 51% (35/68) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (35/53) |
| 44% (16/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (18/41) |
| 42% (5/12) | Break Pts Won % | 41% (7/17) |
| 44% (41/94) | Return Points Win % | 51% (53/104) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Imamura Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-4 5-7 6-1 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 1-6 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-0 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 4-6 6-3 7-6(5) | ||
C. E. Overbeck Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | W | 3-6 7-5 6-2 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 5-7 6-1 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(3) 7-6(2) | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||

M. Imamura vs C. E. Overbeck Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.19% (167/125) | YTD Win/Loss | 65.85% (54/28) |
| 56.81% (371/282) | Sets Win/Loss | 62.30% (114/69) |
| 53.05% (3227/2856) | Games Win/Loss | 55.30% (950/768) |
| 57.74% (153/112) | Hard Win/Loss | 75.86% (22/7) |
| 42.86% (6/8) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.42% (29/19) |
| 61.54% (8/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.00% (3/2) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.34 |
| 453 | Aces Total | 283 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 327 | Total Double Faults | 192 |
| 1:11:4 | Average Match Time | 1:14:19 |
| 455.3 | Average Opponent Rank | 335.5 |
| 65% (9188/14069) | 1st Serve % | 64% (2650/4151) |
| 65% (6008/9188) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (1824/2650) |
| 50% (2423/4881) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (718/1501) |
| 45% (683/1527) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (204/465) |
| 41% (6018/14502) | Return Points Win % | 42% (1780/4206) |
| 40.91% (27/39) | Challenger W/L | 66.67% (10/5) |
| 61.95% (140/86) | Futures W/L | 65.67% (44/23) |
| 57% (166/290) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (54/82) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (31/59) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (6/14) |
| 46% (32/69) | Deciding Set Win % | 68% (13/19) |
| 89% (172/153) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 96% (47/45) |
| 11% (172/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 4% (47/2) |
| 12% (120/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (35/9) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Mayar Sherif vs Eva Vedder Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 26th November 2025 Best Bets

Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Elena Malygina Prediction – WTA W75 Trnava – 26th November 2025 Best Bets

James Duckworth vs Karan Singh Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 26th November 2025 Best Bets

Luisina Giovannini vs Leolia Jeanjean Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 25th November 2025 Best Bets

Luisina Giovannini vs Leolia Jeanjean Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 25th November 2025 Best Bets
