Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Marvin Moeller vs Leopold Zima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Moeller vs Zima analysis and find out who is favored!
Marvin Moeller vs Leopold Zima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Moeller has won 52.87% of points on his second serve, while Zima has won 41.13%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Moeller, in recent form, has won 53.5% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zima has won 46.29%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.37% and 29.12% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Moeller has saved 58.39% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zima has saved 55.24% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Moeller has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 50/ 25), with Zima winning 55.77% (W/L 29/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Moeller has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 60/ 35), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 10/ 9). Zima has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 53/ 33), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 58/ 55).
- Player level: In the last year, Moeller has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 78.95% of matches (W/L 30/ 8), where as Zima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.86% of matches (W/L 29/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Moeller winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Moeller winning 2 and Zima winning 2. The last match between Moeller and Zima was at the M25 Falun, 28-09-2021, First, I.hard with Leopold Zima getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:30:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Moeller and Zima have played a deciding set 0 times, with Moeller winning 0 times and Zima 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Moeller winning 0, and Zima 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Moeller has played against opponents with an average rank of 237 while Zima has played against players with an average rank of 134.31.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Moeller has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zima has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Moeller has converted 38.55% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zima has converted 45.88% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Moeller 1 - 1 Zima
309
Rank
296
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
895
Rank
774
High
23
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
62% (167-102)
Career Total W/L
56% (155-123)
46% (6-7)
YTD W/L
65% (15-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Marvin Moeller | Leopold Zima |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 19 | 18 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 16 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:0 | 1:30:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (72/115) | 63% (76/121) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (48/72) | 76% (58/76) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (25/43) | 38% (17/45) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 31% (4/13) | 57% (4/7) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (46/121) | 37% (42/115) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Leopold Zima
Player
Marvin Moeller
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
12
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
| 6-1 7-5 |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
Leopold Zima
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Marvin Moeller | Leopold Zima |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 46% (6/7) | 65% (15/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (16/15) | 60% (32/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (150/152) | 53% (281/248) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 50% (3/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (5/4) | 70% (7/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.3 | 0.25 |
| Aces Total | 45 | 64 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.09 |
| DFs Total | 34 | 23 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:35 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 332.62 | 133.35 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (626/950) | 69% (528/770) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (413/626) | 72% (378/528) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (158/324) | 43% (104/242) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (41/102) | 41% (24/58) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (404/1000) | 35% (251/727) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 46% (6/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (15/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 46% (6/13) | 65% (15/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 50% (4/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 20% (1/5) | 71% (5/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (7/5) | 93% (15/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (7/2) | 7% (15/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 13% (8/1) |
Marvin Moeller Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Marvin Moeller
57%
(
50 of
88)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
1-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
Marvin Moeller
63%
(
60 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
32%
(
7 of
22)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
42 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
50 of
98)
104
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Rincon
Player
Marvin Moeller
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
Svyatoslav Gulin
72%
(
78 of
109)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
39 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
25 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
103
|
1-6 7-6(2) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zdenek Kolar
Player
Marvin Moeller
72%
(
73 of
101)
1st Serve %
77%
(
86 of
111)
7
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
51 of
86)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
44 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
51 of
111)
108
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
Filip Krajinovic
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
75%
(
65 of
87)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
Daniel Cox
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
David Poljak
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
4
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Marvin Moeller
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
Tibo Colson
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Leopold Zima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-3 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(12) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Yannik Kelm
Player
Leopold Zima
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Leopold Zima
Player
Emanuele Turconi
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
33 of
46)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 1-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Leopold Zima
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Moeller Vs Zima Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
