Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Martyn Pawelski vs Michael Zheng Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Pawelski vs Zheng analysis and find out who is favored!
Martyn Pawelski vs Michael Zheng Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pawelski has won 47.72% of points on his second serve, while Zheng has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pawelski, in recent form, has won 50.28% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zheng has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.65% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pawelski has saved 59.12% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zheng has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pawelski has won 65% of matches played (W/L 39/ 21), with Zheng winning 54.55% (W/L 12/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pawelski has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 48/ 29), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 10/ 9). Zheng has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 12/ 7), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 3/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Pawelski has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.86% of matches (W/L 38/ 18), where as Zheng has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.25% of matches (W/L 9/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pawelski has played against opponents with an average rank of 169.12 while Zheng has played against players with an average rank of 318.32.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pawelski has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zheng has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pawelski has converted 38.12% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zheng has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Pawelski 0 - 0 Zheng
470
Rank
469
High
19
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
530
Rank
520
High
20
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
60% (70-47)
Career Total W/L
58% (30-22)
69% (20-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$45,000
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Martyn Pawelski | Michael Zheng |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 69% (20/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (43/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (355/307) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 73% (11/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (9/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.8 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 259 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 69 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:50 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 128.52 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1233/1971) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 77% (952/1233) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (356/738) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (69/181) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (738/2034) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 73% (19/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 68% (19/28) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 58% (7/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (6/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 85% (20/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 15% (20/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Martyn Pawelski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Martyn Pawelski
65%
(
67 of
103)
1st Serve %
64%
(
79 of
124)
11
Aces
15
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
59 of
79)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
32%
(
33 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
47 of
124)
117
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(4) 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Peter Fajta
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
15
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Lukas Pokorny
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
13
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
0
90%
(
35 of
39)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
28 of
36)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
14 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
16 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Olaf Pieczkowski
Player
Martyn Pawelski
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Cedric Stanke
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
73%
(
59 of
81)
10
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
5
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Lorenzo Lorusso
44%
(
28 of
64)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
7
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
10
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amr Elsayed
Player
Martyn Pawelski
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
6
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
89%
(
34 of
38)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
26 of
32)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Vladimir Uzhylovsky
60%
(
3 of
5)
1st Serve %
57%
(
8 of
14)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
67%
(
2 of
3)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
100%
(
2 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
12
Total Points Won
7
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| F |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Martyn Pawelski
63%
(
68 of
108)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
18
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
54 of
68)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
54 of
65)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
34 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
31 of
96)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
view more
Michael Zheng Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Michael Zheng
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Michael Zheng
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
13
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
15 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Zheng
Player
Franco Agamenone
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andres Martin
Player
Michael Zheng
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Zheng
Player
Kareem Allaf
59%
(
17 of
29)
1st Serve %
45%
(
17 of
38)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
6 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
44
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Michael Zheng
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Zheng
Player
Eli Stephenson
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Michael Zheng
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
74%
(
37 of
50)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Zheng
Player
Hunter Heck
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
49%
(
44 of
89)
6
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
9
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Michael Zheng
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
93)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
23 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
95
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Pawelski Vs Zheng Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
