Marton Fucsovics vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do second serve performances compare? In recent analyses, Fucsovics has a slight edge, winning 45.03% of second serve points, compared to Zandschulp's 42.22%.
• When it comes to return games, Fucsovics slightly leads by winning 47.76% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zandschulp captures 46.65%.
• Analyzing first serve returns, Zandschulp has the advantage, winning 27.43% compared to Fucsovics's 24.97%.
• Their performance under pressure suggests Fucsovics has a minor edge, saving 53.8% of breakpoints, slightly better than Zandschulp’s 52.22%.
• In match wins over the past year, Fucsovics is more successful, claiming victory in 66.13% of matches, whereas Zandschulp has won 53.85%.
• Their best surfaces differ; Fucsovics performs best on Grass with a 59% win rate, while Zandschulp excels on Indoor Hard with 63% wins.
• Both players frequently compete on the Main tour, but Fucsovics holds a superior win rate there at 71.43%, compared to Zandschulp's 57.14%.
• Head-to-head, Zandschulp leads with 2 wins out of 3 encounters, but both have won 4 sets each in total.
• Considering the last matchups and deciding set performance, Zandschulp has shown resilience, winning both deciding sets against Fucsovics.
• In high-pressure tiebreakers, Zandschulp again has a slight edge, winning 2 of their 3 tiebreaks.
• Average opponent rank suggests Zandschulp faces tougher competition, contesting players ranked on average 134.34, compared to Fucsovics's opponents ranked 173.35.
• If the match extends to a deciding set, Fucsovics has a better record over the last 12 months, winning 59% compared to Zandschulp's 48%.
• Their breakpoint conversion rates are nearly identical, with Zandschulp at 32.52% and Fucsovics at 31.84%, indicating closely matched abilities in crucial moments.

Editorial Prediction (August 23, 2025, UTC):

The statistical overview between Fucsovics and Zandschulp showcases a balanced rivalry with each holding certain advantages. Fucsovics dominates in second serve effectiveness and overall win percentage over the past year, demonstrating superior consistency in closing matches.

Zandschulp, however, has shown mental toughness in head-to-head encounters, possessing a slight lead in their direct matchups and excelling in first serve returns and tiebreak situations. His ability to perform against higher-ranked opponents indicates resilience and adaptability in challenging settings.

Considering their current form and past encounters, this match is likely to be highly competitive. Fucsovics's consistent form and edge in deciding sets provide him a narrow favor as the probable victor in this upcoming clash.