Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Martina Trevisan vs Nadiya Kichenok Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Trevisan vs Kichenok analysis and find out who is favored!
Martina Trevisan vs Nadiya Kichenok Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Trevisan has won 40.84% of points on his second serve, while Kichenok has won 47.92%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Trevisan, in recent form, has won 50.55% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kichenok has won 51.02%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.94% and 43.86% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Trevisan has saved 59.32% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kichenok has saved 35% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Trevisan has won 46.15% of matches played (W/L 24/ 28), with Kichenok winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Trevisan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 222/ 111), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 9% (W/L 1/ 10). Kichenok has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 55/ 37), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 41/ 47).
- Player level: In the last year, Trevisan has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 45% of matches (W/L 9/ 11), where as Kichenok has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 1/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Trevisan winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Trevisan winning 2 and Kichenok winning 0. The last match between Trevisan and Kichenok was at the Volvo Car Open - Charleston, 01-04-2019, First, Clay with Martina Trevisan getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:58:11.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Trevisan and Kichenok have played a deciding set 0 times, with Trevisan winning 0 times and Kichenok 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Trevisan winning 0, and Kichenok 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Trevisan has played against opponents with an average rank of 132.54 while Kichenok has played against players with an average rank of 543.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Trevisan has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kichenok has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Trevisan has converted 47.73% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kichenok has converted 52.63% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Trevisan 1 - 0 Kichenok
76
Rank
18
High
30
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
703
Rank
100
High
31
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
59% (296-203)
Career Total W/L
55% (204-166)
32% (6-13)
YTD W/L
50% (1-1)
$2,230,133
Career Prize Money
$66,148
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Martina Trevisan | Nadiya Kichenok |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:58:11 | 0:58:11 |
| 1st Serve % | 81% (35/43) | 65% (30/46) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (22/35) | 27% (8/30) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 38% (3/8) | 44% (7/16) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 64% (7/11) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Points W% | 67% (31/46) | 42% (18/43) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Martina Trevisan
Player
Nadiya Kichenok
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
18 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Martina Trevisan | Nadiya Kichenok |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 32% (6/13) | 50% (1/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 33% (14/28) | 40% (2/3) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (181/218) | 44% (21/27) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 25% (3/9) | 50% (1/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.13 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 26 | 5 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0.39 |
| DFs Total | 74 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:47 | 1:53:28 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 100.79 | 543.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (942/1407) | 70% (110/158) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (565/942) | 48% (53/110) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 41% (192/465) | 48% (23/48) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (62/129) | 53% (10/19) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (532/1286) | 46% (75/163) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 14% (1/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (3/2) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 32% (6/19) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (15/2) | 0% (1/0) |
Martina Trevisan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sloane Stephens
Player
Martina Trevisan
75%
(
80 of
107)
1st Serve %
73%
(
98 of
134)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
54 of
98)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
41%
(
44 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
66 of
134)
129
Total Points Won
112
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anhelina Kalinina
Player
Martina Trevisan
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Naomi Osaka
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Martina Trevisan
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
79 of
108)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
32%
(
7 of
22)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
59 of
108)
91
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Tereza Martincova
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
82%
(
40 of
49)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
54
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Kaitlin Quevedo
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Storm Hunter
Player
Martina Trevisan
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve %
74%
(
26 of
35)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
8 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
41
Total Points Won
26
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oceane Dodin
Player
Martina Trevisan
54%
(
66 of
122)
1st Serve %
61%
(
80 of
132)
4
Aces
3
15
Double Faults
14
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
51 of
80)
38%
(
21 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
50 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
59 of
132)
131
Total Points Won
123
|
7-5 4-6 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Renata Zarazua
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
80%
(
68 of
85)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Diane Parry
Player
Martina Trevisan
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
77%
(
24 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Nadiya Kichenok Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Nadiya Kichenok
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nadiya Kichenok
Player
Raveena Kingsley
70%
(
77 of
110)
1st Serve %
72%
(
71 of
98)
5
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
0
53%
(
41 of
77)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
48%
(
53 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Nadiya Kichenok
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
8
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
11)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
63
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Valentini Grammatikopoulou
Player
Nadiya Kichenok
65%
(
62 of
96)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
89)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
9
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
89)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 6-7(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cadence Brace
Player
Nadiya Kichenok
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
21 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nadiya Kichenok
Player
Olivia Tjandramulia
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
7
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ulrikke Eikeri
Player
Nadiya Kichenok
66%
(
68 of
103)
1st Serve %
51%
(
52 of
102)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
40 of
52)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
15 of
50)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
41 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
102)
109
Total Points Won
96
|
5-7 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nadiya Kichenok
Player
Catherine Harrison
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nadiya Kichenok
Player
Christina Mchale
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
72%
(
66 of
92)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
44 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Beatriz Haddad Maia
Player
Nadiya Kichenok
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
15%
(
5 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Trevisan Vs Kichenok Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
