Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Martina Trevisan vs Lucrezia Stefanini Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Trevisan vs Stefanini analysis and find out who is favored!
Martina Trevisan vs Lucrezia Stefanini Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Trevisan has won 41.19% of points on his second serve, while Stefanini has won 45.34%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Trevisan, in recent form, has won 50.69% of his opponent's second serve points, while Stefanini has won 60.18%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.91% and 40.27% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Trevisan has saved 59.9% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stefanini has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Trevisan has won 49.06% of matches played (W/L 26/ 27), with Stefanini winning 53.33% (W/L 32/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Trevisan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 222/ 109), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 9% (W/L 1/ 10). Stefanini has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 83/ 49), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 7/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Trevisan has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 47.37% of matches (W/L 9/ 10), where as Stefanini has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.76% of matches (W/L 21/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Trevisan has played against opponents with an average rank of 136.92 while Stefanini has played against players with an average rank of 233.22.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Trevisan has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stefanini has won 46% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Trevisan has converted 48.39% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stefanini has converted 46.63% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Trevisan 0 - 0 Stefanini
N/A
Rank
High
30
Age
L
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
Form
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
0% (0-0)
Career Total W/L
0% (0-0)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Martina Trevisan | Lucrezia Stefanini |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 35% (6/11) | 45% (9/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 35% (13/24) | 46% (19/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (162/189) | 50% (182/180) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 25% (3/9) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 50% (4/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (5/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.15 | 0.03 |
| Aces Total | 26 | 5 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 65 | 50 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:51 | 1:34:47 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 105.82 | 246 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (805/1219) | 75% (922/1222) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (495/805) | 55% (507/922) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (173/414) | 46% (138/300) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (53/108) | 46% (81/175) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (464/1123) | 48% (580/1217) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 17% (1/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 50% (3/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (3/2) | 46% (6/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 35% (6/17) | 44% (8/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 80% (10/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 10% (10/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 10% (10/1) |
Martina Trevisan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Martina Trevisan
Player
Naomi Osaka
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Martina Trevisan
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
79 of
108)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
32%
(
7 of
22)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
59 of
108)
91
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Tereza Martincova
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
82%
(
40 of
49)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
54
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Kaitlin Quevedo
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Storm Hunter
Player
Martina Trevisan
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve %
74%
(
26 of
35)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
8 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
41
Total Points Won
26
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oceane Dodin
Player
Martina Trevisan
54%
(
66 of
122)
1st Serve %
61%
(
80 of
132)
4
Aces
3
15
Double Faults
14
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
51 of
80)
38%
(
21 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
50 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
59 of
132)
131
Total Points Won
123
|
7-5 4-6 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Renata Zarazua
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
80%
(
68 of
85)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Diane Parry
Player
Martina Trevisan
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
77%
(
24 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Storm Hunter
Player
Martina Trevisan
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Potapova
Player
Martina Trevisan
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Lucrezia Stefanini Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Zhuoxuan Bai
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
74%
(
58 of
78)
1st Serve %
78%
(
71 of
91)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
82%
(
46 of
56)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
21 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Nigina Abduraimova
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve %
78%
(
45 of
58)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Emily Appleton
82%
(
60 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anca Alexia Todoni
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
50%
(
44 of
88)
1st Serve %
67%
(
63 of
94)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
47 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Erika Andreeva
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve %
61%
(
11 of
18)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
89%
(
8 of
9)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
100%
(
4 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
1 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
23
Total Points Won
8
|
5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Natalija Stevanovic
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve %
71%
(
56 of
79)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
34 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zeynep Sonmez
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
22%
(
4 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasiia Gureva
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Trevisan Vs Stefanini Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Martina Trevisan
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
