Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Martin Klizan vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Klizan vs Gimeno-Traver analysis and find out who is favored!
Martin Klizan vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Klizan has won 53.2% of points on his second serve, while Gimeno-Traver has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Klizan, in recent form, has won 54.72% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gimeno-Traver has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.45% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Klizan has saved 47.89% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gimeno-Traver has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Klizan has won 80% of matches played (W/L 16/ 4), with Gimeno-Traver winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Klizan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 291/ 173), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 21% (W/L 4/ 15). Gimeno-Traver has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 578/ 369), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 21% (W/L 6/ 22).
- Player level: In the last year, Klizan has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 82.35% of matches (W/L 14/ 3), where as Gimeno-Traver has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 5 times before with Klizan winning 3 times. They have played 11 sets in total, with Klizan winning 6 and Gimeno-Traver winning 5. The last match between Klizan and Gimeno-Traver was at the Barletta Challenger, 12-04-2018, Second, Clay with Daniel Gimeno-Traver getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:11:13.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Klizan and Gimeno-Traver have played a deciding set 1 times, with Klizan winning 1 times and Gimeno-Traver 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Klizan winning 0, and Gimeno-Traver 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Klizan has played against opponents with an average rank of 168.45 while Gimeno-Traver has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Klizan has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gimeno-Traver has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Klizan has converted 53.76% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gimeno-Traver has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Klizan 3 - 2 Gimeno-Traver
843
Rank
24
High
34
Age
L
Plays
3
Total2
0
Hard0
3
Clay2
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
48
High
38
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
58% (478-350)
Career Total W/L
57% (625-479)
81% (13-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,947,100
Career Prize Money
$1,102,200
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Klizan VS Gimeno-Traver H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Martin Klizan | Daniel Gimeno-Traver |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 3 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 5 |
| Games Won | 51 | 48 |
| Aces (Total) | 12 | 9 |
| DFs (Total) | 20 | 17 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:11:13 | 1:11:13 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (187/317) | 66% (218/331) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (131/187) | 62% (136/218) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (52/130) | 48% (54/113) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 55% (17/31) | 42% (16/38) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (141/331) | 42% (134/317) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (3/5) | 40% (2/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Klizan VS Gimeno-Traver H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 4-1 ret. |
Stats 
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Player
Martin Klizan
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
| 6-3 5-7 7-5 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
65%
(
68 of
104)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
93)
6
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
7
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
96
|
||||
| 6-4 6-0 |
Stats
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Player
Martin Klizan
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
6 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
73
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Martin Klizan | Daniel Gimeno-Traver |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 81% (13/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 71% (24/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 58% (173/123) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 85% (11/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.24 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 34 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 22 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:10:59 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 210.56 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (391/697) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (269/391) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (160/306) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (36/72) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (305/705) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 85% (11/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 79% (11/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (11/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (11/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 40% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Martin Klizan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Martin Klizan
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
41%
(
18 of
44)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Filip Peliwo
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Michael Agwi
56%
(
55 of
98)
1st Serve %
54%
(
62 of
114)
2
Aces
14
5
Double Faults
8
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
60%
(
26 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
33 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
46 of
114)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(4) 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Edas Butvilas
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Andrea Guerrieri
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
75
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Gabriel Decamps
53%
(
10 of
19)
1st Serve %
60%
(
9 of
15)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
7 of
10)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
11 of
15)
25
Total Points Won
9
|
5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Filip Peliwo
47%
(
38 of
81)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
93)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
65%
(
28 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
100
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 6-7(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 2-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Daniel Gimeno-Traver Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
68)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ernests Gulbis
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
37%
(
18 of
49)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mario Vilella Martinez
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktor Galovic
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
5
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
10
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
31 of
36)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
17%
(
6 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Player
Pol Toledo Bague
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
3
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
5
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabien Reboul
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
12
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
10
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Klizan Vs Gimeno-Traver Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Martin Klizan
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
