Marsel Ilhan vs Caio Silva Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ilhan vs Silva analysis and find out who is favored!
Marsel Ilhan vs Caio Silva Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ilhan has won 45.81% of points on his second serve, while Silva has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ilhan, in recent form, has won 55.78% of his opponent's second serve points, while Silva has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.94% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ilhan has saved 48.24% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Silva has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ilhan has won 57.58% of matches played (W/L 19/ 14), with Silva winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ilhan has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 303/ 165), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 19/ 22). Silva has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 41% (W/L 104/ 151), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 36% (W/L 20/ 35).
- Player level: In the last year, Ilhan has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.67% of matches (W/L 17/ 13), where as Silva has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ilhan winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ilhan winning 2 and Silva winning 0. The last match between Ilhan and Silva was at the Turkey F12 (Antalya), 29-03-2017, First, Clay with Marsel Ilhan getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:11:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ilhan and Silva have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ilhan winning 0 times and Silva 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ilhan winning 0, and Silva 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ilhan has played against opponents with an average rank of 58.12 while Silva has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ilhan has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Silva has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ilhan has converted 44.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Silva has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ilhan 1 - 0 Silva
23
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
19
Minor
877
Rank
77
High
36
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
610
High
32
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
59% (645-451)
Career Total W/L
40% (124-186)
59% (10-7)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$591,915
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Marsel Ilhan | Caio Silva |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 4 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 1:11:0 | 1:11:0 |
1st Serve % | 50% (29/58) | 83% (44/53) |
1st Serve Win% | 83% (24/29) | 57% (25/44) |
2nd Serve Win% | 52% (15/29) | 33% (3/9) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 0% (0/5) |
Return Points W% | 47% (25/53) | 33% (19/58) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-2 |
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Caio Silva
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
83%
(
44 of
53)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Marsel Ilhan | Caio Silva |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 59% (10/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 55% (21/17) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (201/178) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 59% (10/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.08 | 0 |
Aces Total | 15 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.09 | 0 |
DFs Total | 17 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:4:31 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 58% (433/745) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 67% (288/433) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 45% (140/312) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 43% (36/84) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 43% (346/808) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 59% (10/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (10/17) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 89% (9/8) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 11% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Marsel Ilhan Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
S Mert Ozdemir
Player
Marsel Ilhan
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kokoro Isomura
Player
Marsel Ilhan
74%
(
68 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
0
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
1
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
43%
(
40 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Gokberk Saritas
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Geni Inoue
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
10
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
46%
(
28 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
94)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Tobias Smoliner
Player
Marsel Ilhan
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Mikhail Korovin
Player
Marsel Ilhan
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Giuseppe La Vela
Player
Marsel Ilhan
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Caio Silva Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Ivan Sabanov
Player
Caio Silva
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ignasi De Rueda De Genover
Player
Caio Silva
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Andre Miele
Player
Caio Silva
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
47%
(
21 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
56
Total Points Won
54
|
4-6 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ryusei Makiguchi
Player
Caio Silva
56%
(
50 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
60 of
94)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
32%
(
29 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
100
Total Points Won
84
|
6-1 6-7(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Erik Crepaldi
Player
Caio Silva
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Thales Turini
Player
Caio Silva
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
22 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
13 of
40)
43
Total Points Won
42
|
7-6(4) ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Caio Silva
Player
Manuel Pena Lopez
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mariano Kestelboim
Player
Caio Silva
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve %
67%
(
22 of
33)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
49
Total Points Won
12
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Caio Silva
Player
Alexander Merino
79%
(
67 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Enrique Bogo
Player
Caio Silva
46%
(
25 of
54)
1st Serve %
80%
(
72 of
90)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H |
view more