Marlon Vankan vs Marc Van Der Merwe Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 16 Oct at 08:38 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Vankan vs M. Van Der Merwe

GER
0
Win
Played
1
Win

RSA
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Vankan 0 - 1 Merwe
They have played 2 sets in total, with Marlon Vankan winning 0 and Marc Van Der Merwe winning 2. The last match between Marc Van Der Merwe and Marlon Vankan was at the M25 Kigali, 16-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Marc Van Der Merwe getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Vankan | 0 |
| Merwe | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Kigali(10-16-25)
M. Vankan vs M. V. D. Merwe H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 53.96% (177-151) | Career Total W/L | 71.43% (25-10) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Vankan vs M. V. D. Merwe Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Marc Van Der Merwe exhibits a slightly superior performance on second serves recently, with a winning rate of 42.70%, in contrast to Marlon Vankan’s 40.10%. Does this provide Van Der Merwe with a crucial advantage? Likely, as it correlates significantly with match outcomes.
- Return Game Proficiency: Marlon Vankan displays stronger return accuracy against second serves, securing 45.66% of points compared to Van Der Merwe’s 43.49%. However, on first serve returns, Van Der Merwe leads with a 31.80% success rate versus Vankan’s 30.20%. Can these differences influence the match outcome? The data suggests they might.
- Handling Pressure: Both players exhibit near-equal resilience under pressure, with Van Der Merwe narrowly surpassing Vankan in saving breakpoints (51.54% versus 51.29%). This indicates high competitiveness, especially in critical moments.
- Recent Performance Overview: Over the past year, Marc Van Der Merwe has a superior match win rate, recording 72.73% compared to 58.33% by Marlon Vankan. Is Van Der Merwe the stronger contender based on these statistics? The figures indeed favor him.
- Preferred Surfaces: Marlon Vankan excels on clay courts with a 57% win rate, whereas Marc Van Der Merwe finds success on hard courts with a matching 57% win rate. Could the playing surface determine the match's favorite? It might, based on these stats.
- Player Level: Both players mostly compete in ITF tournaments, but Van Der Merwe holds a significant win rate advantage of 72.73% compared to Vankan’s 58.33%. How does this impact their match readiness? Van Der Merwe’s higher win rate suggests a competitive edge.
- Quality of Opponents: Marlon Vankan’s recent opponents have an average rank of 355.28, opposed to Van Der Merwe’s more challenging competition ranked at 169.32 on average. Does Van Der Merwe’s experience against stiffer competition provide a match advantage? It potentially does.
- Deciding Set Record: If this clash extends to a deciding set, Van Der Merwe’s impressive 83% winning rate in such scenarios far surpasses Vankan’s 40%. Who is likelier to prevail if the match goes to a decider? Van Der Merwe appears more equipped for victory.
Editorial Prediction (October 16, 2025, UTC):
The forthcoming match showcases two competitors with distinct strengths and ongoing trends. Marc Van Der Merwe holds a slight edge in second serve performance and first serve returns, critical factors often associated with favorable match predictions. His consistent saving of breakpoints adds to this competitive fortitude.
Marlon Vankan, despite exhibiting a robust return game and a predilection for clay surfaces, has faced relatively less challenging opponents on average. This factor, combined with a lesser win rate in deciding sets, positions him at a comparative disadvantage.
Considering the cumulative weight of these statistics, including recent match outcomes and surface preferences, Marc Van Der Merwe emerges as the likely winner for this upcoming encounter.
Marlon Vankan vs Marc Van Der Merwe Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Vankan vs M. V. D. Merwe H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 10 | Games Won | 13 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:44:27 | Average Match Time | 1:44:27 |
| 62% (43/69) | 1st Serve % | 66% (49/74) |
| 67% (29/43) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (32/49) |
| 35% (9/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 60% (15/25) |
| 38% (3/8) | Break Pts Won % | 57% (4/7) |
| 36% (27/74) | Return Points Win % | 45% (31/69) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Vankan Recent Matches Played
M. V. D. Merwe Recent Matches Played

M. Vankan vs M. V. D. Merwe Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.96% (177/151) | YTD Win/Loss | 71.43% (25/10) |
| 53.52% (395/343) | Sets Win/Loss | 66.67% (52/26) |
| 51.17% (3501/3341) | Games Win/Loss | 56.76% (407/310) |
| 34.62% (9/17) | Hard Win/Loss | 73.33% (22/8) |
| 56.36% (164/127) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.00% (3/2) |
| 36.36% (4/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 333 | Aces Total | 26 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 586 | Total Double Faults | 70 |
| 1:14:23 | Average Match Time | 1:18:53 |
| 369.14 | Average Opponent Rank | 208.66 |
| 66% (10523/15929) | 1st Serve % | 64% (1197/1868) |
| 62% (6555/10523) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (755/1197) |
| 48% (2613/5406) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (366/671) |
| 44% (745/1695) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (99/224) |
| 41% (6558/15848) | Return Points Win % | 44% (846/1934) |
| 40.00% (4/6) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 54.40% (173/145) | Futures W/L | 71.43% (25/10) |
| 54% (175/323) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 71% (25/35) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (32/61) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 25% (2/8) |
| 51% (43/85) | Deciding Set Win % | 75% (6/8) |
| 89% (172/153) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (23/23) |
| 11% (172/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (23/0) |
| 15% (156/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (12/2) |