Marko Miladinovic vs Fredrik Krogh Solheim Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• When it comes to second serve performance in the last six months, Miladinovic wins 46.61% of points compared to Solheim's 39.79%. Could this provide Miladinovic with an edge? Possibly, as second serve effectiveness is highly linked with match outcomes.
• Analyzing return game strength, Miladinovic wins 49.32% of opponent’s second serve points, whereas Solheim wins 42.24%, giving Miladinovic a stronger return game on second serves.
• For first serve returns, Solheim has a 26.92% win rate, slightly ahead of Miladinovic’s 25.16%. Does this give Solheim an advantage? Marginally, but it is notable.
• Under pressure, Miladinovic saves 50% of breakpoints faced, while Solheim saves 47.19%, indicating a comparable ability to withstand critical moments.
• Over the past year, Miladinovic has won 66.67% of matches, which outpaces Solheim’s 54% win rate. This suggests a better overall performance by Miladinovic.
• Looking at surface performance, Miladinovic excels on indoor hard courts with a 67% win rate, while Solheim is better on clay with 58% wins. Does surface preference impact this match? It might, depending on the surface being played.
• In terms of competition level, both play at Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level tournaments. However, Miladinovic’s higher win percentage (66.67%) suggests a solid form in this category.
• Miladinovic faces slightly weaker opponents (average rank 151.71) compared to Solheim’s 145.54, which may skew the win-loss comparison slightly.
• If the match reaches a deciding set, be aware that Miladinovic has won only 25% of such scenarios, while Solheim has an impressive 54% success rate.
• Regarding break point conversion, Miladinovic converts 38.46% of opportunities, significantly better than Solheim’s 25.93%, indicating superior ability to capitalize on opponent weaknesses.

Editorial Prediction (September 16, 2025, UTC):

In examining recent performance, Miladinovic shows a clear edge with a superior second serve performance, both in terms of winning points and breaking opponents’ serves. These statistics heavily influence outcomes, suggesting a potential advantage.

Furthermore, Miladinovic's stronger breakpoint conversion rate highlights their ability to seize critical moments in a match, creating additional leverage compared to Solheim.

Although Solheim performs better in deciding sets, the overall win rates and second serve return statistics seem to slightly tilt the favor towards Miladinovic. However, Solheim's capability to handle deciding sets should not be underestimated, adding an unpredictable layer to the potential match outcome.

Taking both player strengths and recent trends into account, Miladinovic appears to be the more likely to triumph in the upcoming match.