Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mark Whitehouse vs Derek Pham Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Whitehouse vs Pham analysis and find out who is favored!
Mark Whitehouse vs Derek Pham Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Whitehouse has won 46.19% of points on his second serve, while Pham has won 44.67%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Whitehouse, in recent form, has won 48.43% of his opponent's second serve points, while Pham has won 56.57%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.81% and 32.75% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Whitehouse has saved 59.71% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pham has saved 52.94% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Whitehouse has won 39.02% of matches played (W/L 16/ 25), with Pham winning 51.85% (W/L 14/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Whitehouse has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 51% (W/L 40/ 39), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 13/ 16). Pham has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 37/ 25), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Whitehouse has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 37.04% of matches (W/L 10/ 17), where as Pham has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 51.85% of matches (W/L 14/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Whitehouse winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Whitehouse winning 2 and Pham winning 0. The last match between Whitehouse and Pham was at the M25 Traralgon, 23-11-2022, First, Hard with Mark Whitehouse getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:29:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Whitehouse and Pham have played a deciding set 0 times, with Whitehouse winning 0 times and Pham 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Whitehouse winning 0, and Pham 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Whitehouse has played against opponents with an average rank of 336.51 while Pham has played against players with an average rank of 153.56.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Whitehouse has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pham has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Whitehouse has converted 34.59% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pham has converted 33.82% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Whitehouse 1 - 0 Pham
861
Rank
523
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
893
Rank
786
High
20
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
50% (181-181)
Career Total W/L
55% (38-31)
42% (5-7)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Whitehouse VS Pham H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Mark Whitehouse | Derek Pham |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:0 | 1:29:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (49/68) | 63% (44/70) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (35/49) | 59% (26/44) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (11/19) | 46% (12/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 30% (3/10) | 0% (0/11) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (32/70) | 32% (22/68) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Whitehouse VS Pham H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Mark Whitehouse
Player
Derek Pham
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
11)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mark Whitehouse | Derek Pham |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 42% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 44% (12/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (121/140) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.76 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 96 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 37 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:16 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 137.25 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (526/830) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (387/526) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (135/304) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (19/58) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (275/793) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 42% (5/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Mark Whitehouse Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Carlos Gimeno Valero
Player
Mark Whitehouse
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikalai Haliak
Player
Mark Whitehouse
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Mark Whitehouse
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
5
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
6
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mark Whitehouse
Player
Andrin Casanova
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
43%
(
39 of
91)
10
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
86%
(
37 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Mark Whitehouse
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
74 of
112)
11
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
6
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
55 of
74)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
26 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
112)
106
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mark Whitehouse
Player
Adam Panaras
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
100%
(
26 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Mark Whitehouse
Player
Hugo Pierre
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
9 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Mark Whitehouse
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
16
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Mark Whitehouse
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
96)
11
Aces
21
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
49 of
64)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
25 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
96)
91
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mark Whitehouse
Player
Ioannis Kountourakis
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
7
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
7
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
36 of
44)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
29 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
25 of
79)
93
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Derek Pham Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Samir Banerjee
Player
Derek Pham
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Derek Pham
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Derek Pham
Player
Noah Schachter
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
29 of
59)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Derek Pham
Player
Alex Martinez
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Derek Pham
Player
Axel Nefve
70%
(
83 of
119)
1st Serve %
67%
(
83 of
124)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
60 of
83)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
39%
(
46 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
48 of
124)
121
Total Points Won
122
|
7-6(7) 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Derek Pham
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
70%
(
83 of
119)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
47 of
83)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
54 of
119)
111
Total Points Won
106
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Catry
Player
Derek Pham
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
74%
(
55 of
74)
10
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Derek Pham
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Colin Sinclair
Player
Derek Pham
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve %
42%
(
8 of
19)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
88%
(
7 of
8)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
35%
(
8 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
25
Total Points Won
17
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Derek Pham
Player
Zachary Viiala
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Whitehouse Vs Pham Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
