Mark Lajal vs Murphy Cassone Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Lajal vs M. Cassone

Mark Lajal
EST
w
w
l
w
w
w
l
w
w
l
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
22
Age
23
-
Height
-
149
C. Rank
178
145
Best Rank
172
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$121.8K
Career Money
$75.0K
-
Plays
-

Murphy Cassone
USA
l
w
l
w
w
l
l
w
l
l
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
22
Age
23
-
Height
-
149
C. Rank
178
145
Best Rank
172
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$121.8K
Career Money
$75.0K
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Lajal 0 - 0 Cassone
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Lajal | 0 |
Cassone | 0 |
Last 0 H2H Matches:
No past h2h happened.
M. Lajal vs M. Cassone H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$121,800 | Career Prize Money | $74,970 |
61.32% (176-111) | Career Total W/L | 58.93% (99-69) |
5 | Titles | 2 |
33.33% (1-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
M. Lajal vs M. Cassone Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mark Lajal has won 45.57% of points on their second serve, while Murphy Cassone has won 45.19%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mark Lajal, in recent form, has won 47.02% of their opponent's second serve points, while Murphy Cassone has won 44.15%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.01% and 24.54% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mark Lajal has saved 56.96% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Murphy Cassone has saved 56.93% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mark Lajal has won 65.75% of matches played (W/L 48/25), with Murphy Cassone winning 57.97% (W/L 40/29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mark Lajal has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 103/56), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 13/17). Murphy Cassone has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 35/16), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 29% (W/L 2/5).
- Player level: In the last year, Mark Lajal has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.52% of matches (W/L 37/17), where as Murphy Cassone has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.40% of matches (W/L 35/22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mark Lajal has played against opponents with an average rank of 229.78 while Murphy Cassone has played against players with an average rank of 281.2.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mark Lajal has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Murphy Cassone has won 48% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mark Lajal has converted 31.84% of breakpoint opportunities, and Murphy Cassone has converted 29.17% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Mark Lajal vs Murphy Cassone Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Lajal 51%, Cassone 50%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Lajal 51%, Cassone 48%.
Break Points Saved %: Lajal 63%, Cassone 65%.
M. Lajal Recent Matches Played
M. Cassone Recent Matches Played

M. Lajal vs M. Cassone Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
61.32% (176/111) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.93% (99/69) |
60.18% (411/272) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.40% (225/167) |
53.71% (3516/3030) | Games Win/Loss | 52.81% (1982/1771) |
64.78% (103/56) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.00% (56/44) |
43.33% (13/17) | Clay Win/Loss | 28.57% (2/5) |
60.98% (50/32) | Indoor Hard W/L | 68.63% (35/16) |
62.50% (10/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 60.00% (6/4) |
0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.46 |
1404 | Aces Total | 849 |
0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
957 | Total Double Faults | 470 |
1:44:35 | Average Match Time | 1:30:37 |
358.54 | Average Opponent Rank | 353.62 |
63% (12881/20286) | 1st Serve % | 64% (6781/10664) |
71% (9207/12881) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (4849/6781) |
50% (3705/7411) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1971/3882) |
42% (851/2041) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (406/985) |
40% (8169/20466) | Return Points Win % | 39% (4117/10682) |
42.86% (6/8) | Slam W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
40.00% (2/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
61.54% (8/5) | Main Tour W/L | 57.14% (4/3) |
61.54% (104/65) | Challenger W/L | 58.76% (57/40) |
65.88% (56/29) | Futures W/L | 63.79% (37/21) |
61% (172/281) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (97/164) |
75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
56% (56/100) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (32/61) |
46% (49/107) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (29/56) |
84% (173/146) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (99/85) |
16% (173/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (99/13) |
27% (114/31) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (69/13) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
04:30 AM 15/10/25
PredictionW1
2.79
W2
1.4
12:00 PM 15/10/25
PredictionW1
2.94
W2
1.4
04:00 PM 15/10/25
PredictionW1
1.166
W2
5.1
12:00 PM 16/10/25
PredictionW1
1.48
W2
2.64
11:30 AM 15/10/25
PredictionW1
2.07
W2
1.7
05:00 PM 15/10/25
PredictionW1
5.2
W2
1.136
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Dzumhur Vs Etcheverry H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
Top Predictions Today
19:00
H2H 0-3
13:00
H2H 0-3
04:00
H2H 2-1
12:00
H2H 0-2
20:30
H2H 0-2
Tennis Events This Week
Almaty Open - Almaty
Kazakhstan
BNP Paribas Nordic Open - Stockholm
Sweden
European Open - Brussels
Belgium
Curitiba Challenger
Brazil
Hersonissos 6 Challenger
Greece
Lincoln Challenger
United States
Olbia Challenger
Italy
Shenzhen Challenger
China
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Offenbach
Germany
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M15 Villers-les-Nancy
France
M25 Kigali
Rwanda
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Santa Margherita di Pula
Italy