Mark Lajal vs Eliot Spizzirri Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 23 Oct at 10:48 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Lajal vs E. Spizzirri

EST
0
Win
Played
1
Win

USA
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Lajal 0 - 1 Spizzirri
They have played 3 sets in total, with Mark Lajal winning 1 and Eliot Spizzirri winning 2. The last match between Eliot Spizzirri and Mark Lajal was at the Brest Challenger, 23-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Eliot Spizzirri getting the victory 3-6 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lajal | 0 |
| Spizzirri | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Brest Challenger(10-23-25)
M. Lajal vs E. Spizzirri H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $129,380 | Career Prize Money | $533,365 |
| 61.25% (177-112) | Career Total W/L | 62.16% (115-70) |
| 0 | Indoor | 1 |
| 5 | Titles | 5 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 33.33% (1-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.14% (4-3) |
M. Lajal vs E. Spizzirri Match Preview:
- Recently, Mark Lajal has won 45.48% of points on their second serve compared to Eliot Spizzirri’s 44.89%. This slight edge may influence match predictions.
- In return game stats, Mark Lajal has secured 47.18% of opponent's second serve points, narrowly outperforming Eliot Spizzirri’s 46.55%.
- First serve return points show Eliot Spizzirri ahead with 27.09%, while Mark Lajal has 24.38%. Could this stat suggest a small advantage for Spizzirri?
- Under pressure, Mark Lajal excels by saving 57.46% of breakpoints against Eliot Spizzirri’s 51.76%. Will this resilience under pressure benefit Lajal?
- Over the past year, Mark Lajal has won 65.75% of matches, slightly outperforming Eliot Spizzirri’s 63.10%.
- Mark Lajal's best surface is Hard with a 65% win rate, whereas Eliot Spizzirri excels on I.hard with the same win percentage. How might these surface preferences affect their play in this match?
- Both players exhibit remarkably similar win percentages in Challengers/ITF tournaments, with Lajal at 68.52% and Spizzirri at 68.33%.
- Where opponent quality is concerned, Mark Lajal has faced stronger competitors, with the average rank being 225.47 compared to Spizzirri’s 234.82.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Spizzirri holds a substantial advantage with a 69% success rate, compared to Lajal’s 52%.
Editorial Prediction (October 23, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Mark Lajal and Eliot Spizzirri presents an intriguing contest with both players showcasing unique strengths.
Mark Lajal's efficiency on the second serve and superior ability to handle pressure by saving breakpoints may give him an edge. Add to this his slightly better track record against tougher opponents, and Lajal seems likely to put in a sturdy performance.
However, Eliot Spizzirri’s adeptness in returning first serves combined with his impressive track record in deciding sets make him a formidable opponent, especially as the match progresses.
After evaluating all the factors, Mark Lajal appears to have a slight edge due to his overall consistency and ability to perform under pressure. Therefore, Lajal is predicted to edge out Spizzirri in this matchup.
Mark Lajal vs Eliot Spizzirri Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Lajal vs E. Spizzirri H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 10 | Games Won | 15 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:55:38 | Average Match Time | 1:55:38 |
| 63% (53/84) | 1st Serve % | 74% (56/76) |
| 62% (33/53) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (38/56) |
| 45% (14/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 60% (12/20) |
| 33% (2/6) | Break Pts Won % | 42% (5/12) |
| 34% (26/76) | Return Points Win % | 44% (37/84) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Lajal Recent Matches Played
E. Spizzirri Recent Matches Played

M. Lajal vs E. Spizzirri Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.25% (177/112) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.16% (115/70) |
| 60.09% (414/275) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.26% (254/182) |
| 53.64% (3541/3061) | Games Win/Loss | 52.37% (2228/2026) |
| 64.78% (103/56) | Hard Win/Loss | 65.25% (77/41) |
| 43.33% (13/17) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (10/10) |
| 60.71% (51/33) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (22/11) |
| 62.50% (10/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 42.86% (6/8) |
| 0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.36 |
| 1423 | Aces Total | 756 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 962 | Total Double Faults | 393 |
| 1:44:47 | Average Match Time | 1:43:44 |
| 359.82 | Average Opponent Rank | 331.52 |
| 63% (12998/20470) | 1st Serve % | 66% (8472/12875) |
| 71% (9281/12998) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (5830/8472) |
| 50% (3736/7478) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (2236/4403) |
| 42% (857/2061) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (549/1287) |
| 40% (8237/20643) | Return Points Win % | 40% (5240/13103) |
| 42.86% (6/8) | Slam W/L | 58.82% (10/7) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 33.33% (3/6) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 61.54% (8/5) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (6/6) |
| 61.40% (105/66) | Challenger W/L | 61.96% (57/35) |
| 65.88% (56/29) | Futures W/L | 70.91% (39/16) |
| 61% (173/283) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (112/178) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 56% (57/101) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (42/70) |
| 46% (50/109) | Deciding Set Win % | 65% (40/62) |
| 84% (174/146) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (98/90) |
| 16% (174/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (98/8) |
| 28% (115/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 29% (87/25) |