Mark Lajal vs Cleeve Harper Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L W L W L
Form
L L W L W L W L L LHead To Head: Lajal 1 - 0 Harper
They have played 2 sets in total, with Lajal winning 2 and Harper winning 0. The last match between Lajal and Harper was at the Oeiras 3 Challenger, 21-01-2025, Q3, I.hard with Mark Lajal getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mark Lajal | 1 |
| Cleeve Harper | 0 |
Oeiras 3 Challenger(21-01-2025)
6
4
6
2
| Lajal | Stats | Harper |
|---|---|---|
| 67% (12-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 33% (2-4) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 199 | Ranking | N/A |
| 191 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 21 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 4 | Titles | 0 |
| 60% (147-96) | Career Total W/L | 48% (39-43) |
| $75,525 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Osaka VS Bronzetti PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Maneiro VS Sherif PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Mark Lajal
Player
Cleeve Harper
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:18:59 | Average Match Time | 1:18:59 |
| 70% (45/64) | 1st Serve % | 67% (37/55) |
| 64% (29/45) | 1st Serve Win % | 51% (19/37) |
| 58% (11/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (8/18) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 51% (28/55) | Return Points Win % | 38% (24/64) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mark Lajal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
Mark Lajal
74%
(
81 of
109)
1st Serve %
68%
(
71 of
104)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
39%
(
42 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
104)
115
Total Points Won
98
|
6-3 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
67%
(
70 of
105)
1st Serve %
65%
(
72 of
110)
5
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
2
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
45%
(
47 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
51 of
110)
109
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(3) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
Mark Lajal
52%
(
74 of
141)
1st Serve %
64%
(
81 of
126)
14
Aces
6
14
Double Faults
7
77%
(
57 of
74)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
58 of
81)
49%
(
33 of
67)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
51 of
141)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
41 of
126)
131
Total Points Won
136
|
7-6(4) 6-7(3) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Nicolas Mejia
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Mark Lajal
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
96)
1
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
25 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
96)
97
Total Points Won
85
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
23 of
29)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Oren Vasser
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
25 of
38)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
55
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Juan Jose Bianchi
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alexander Blockx
Player
Mark Lajal
47%
(
37 of
79)
1st Serve %
73%
(
56 of
77)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Cleeve Harper Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Cleeve Harper
42%
(
31 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
8
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
62%
(
26 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Peniston
Player
Cleeve Harper
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
78%
(
51 of
65)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Cleeve Harper
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cleeve Harper
Player
Aidan Mayo
69%
(
90 of
130)
1st Serve %
44%
(
38 of
87)
1
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
42%
(
54 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
87)
111
Total Points Won
106
|
5-7 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Cleeve Harper
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve %
72%
(
62 of
86)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
76
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cleeve Harper
Player
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
64%
(
75 of
118)
1st Serve %
47%
(
37 of
78)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
5
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
42%
(
50 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
105
Total Points Won
91
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefan Dostanic
Player
Cleeve Harper
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
8
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cleeve Harper
Player
Adam Jones
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Antoine Ghibaudo
Player
Cleeve Harper
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Mayo
Player
Cleeve Harper
52%
(
44 of
85)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (147/96) | Win/Loss | 48% (39/43) |
| 60% (344/231) | Sets Win/Loss | 49% (91/94) |
| 54% (2953/2549) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (876/864) |
| 64% (89/49) | Hard Win/Loss | 48% (25/27) |
| 36% (8/14) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (9/9) |
| 60% (45/30) | Indoor Hard W/L | 42% (5/7) |
| 63% (5/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 1184 | Aces Total | 79 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 746 | Total Double Faults | 160 |
| 1:43:23 | Average Match Time | 1:3:18 |
| 366.98 | Average Opponent Rank | 356.71 |
| 64% (10881/16973) | 1st Serve % | 65% (2192/3398) |
| 71% (7736/10881) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (1383/2192) |
| 50% (3057/6098) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (591/1206) |
| 42% (716/1717) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (140/356) |
| 40% (6905/17226) | Return Points Win % | 40% (1351/3339) |
| 50% (5/5) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40% (2/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (82/57) | Challenger W/L | 33% (6/12) |
| 66% (56/29) | Futures W/L | 52% (33/31) |
| 61% (144/238) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (39/81) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (48/85) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (6/12) |
| 44% (39/88) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (9/22) |
| 85% (145/123) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (39/33) |
| 15% (145/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (39/6) |
| 26% (98/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (43/6) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
