Prediction of Marjorie Crawford vs Joan Hartigan Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Crawford vs J. Hartigan
Marjorie Crawford
AUS
w
w
w
l
l
w
w
w
l
l
3
Win
3
Played
0
Win
121
Age
113
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Joan Hartigan
AUS
l
w
l
w
l
l
w
w
l
l
3
Win
3
Played
0
Win
121
Age
113
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Crawford 3 - 0 Hartigan
They have played 11 sets in total, with Marjorie Crawford winning 7 and Joan Hartigan winning 4. The last match between Marjorie Crawford and Joan Hartigan was at the Sydney 2, 14-11-1932, Round: F, Surface: Grass, with Marjorie Crawford getting the victory 4-6 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Crawford | 3 |
| Hartigan | 0 |
Last 4 H2H Matches:
(F) Sydney 2(11-14-32)
Marjorie Crawford
4
6
6
Joan Hartigan
6
4
4
(SF) Sydney City(08-31-31)
Joan Hartigan
6
5
6
Marjorie Crawford
4
7
4
() Australian Championships(02-27-31)
Marjorie Crawford
6
4
6
Joan Hartigan
4
6
4
M. Crawford vs J. Hartigan H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 69.70% (46-20) | Career Total W/L | 75.65% (233-75) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 2 | Grass | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 3 |
| 3 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Crawford vs J. Hartigan Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Marjorie Crawford has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Joan Hartigan has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Marjorie Crawford, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Joan Hartigan has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Marjorie Crawford has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Joan Hartigan has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Marjorie Crawford has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Joan Hartigan winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Marjorie Crawford has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 72% (W/L 34/13), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 5/3). Joan Hartigan has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 72% (W/L 71/14), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 72% (W/L 144/55).
- Player level: In the last year, Marjorie Crawford has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Joan Hartigan has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Marjorie Crawford winning 3 times and Joan Hartigan being victorious 1 times. They have played 11 sets in total, with Marjorie Crawford winning 7 and Joan Hartigan winning 4.
- The last match between Marjorie Crawford and Joan Hartigan was at the Sydney 2, 14-11-1932, Round: F, Surface: Grass, with Marjorie Crawford getting the victory 4-6 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Marjorie Crawford and Joan Hartigan have played a deciding set 3 times, with Marjorie Crawford winning 2 times and Joan Hartigan 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Marjorie Crawford has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Joan Hartigan has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Marjorie Crawford has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Joan Hartigan has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Marjorie Crawford has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Joan Hartigan has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Marjorie Crawford vs Joan Hartigan Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Crawford vs J. Hartigan H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 7 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 59 | Games Won | 48 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 75% (3/4) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 25% (1/4) |
| 67% (2/3) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Crawford 0%, Hartigan 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Crawford 0%, Hartigan 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Crawford 0%, Hartigan 0%.
M. Crawford Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Houlgate 2 - 19-08-1934 | ||||
SF  Jacqueline PatorniJ. Patorni | L | UNK | ||
| Brisbane - 02-12-1933 | ||||
F Mall MolesworthM. Molesworth | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
SF Sadie MoonS. Moon | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Winchester - 24-07-1933 | ||||
R4  A J MoonA. J | W | 6-2 5-7 7-5 | ||
SF Effie HemmantE. Hemmant | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
J. Hartigan Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wimbledon - 20-06-1949 | ||||
R1 Joy MottramJ. Mottram | L | 6-0 6-4 | ||
| Beckenham - 06-06-1949 | ||||
R3 M BealeM. Beale | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||
R4  Toodles WatermeyerT. Watermeyer | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Wimbledon - 23-06-1947 | ||||
R3 Phyllis GroverP. Grover | L | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | ||
R2 Susan NoelS. Noel | W | 3-6 6-2 6-1 | ||
M. Crawford vs J. Hartigan Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 69.70% (46/20) | YTD Win/Loss | 75.65% (233/75) |
| 68.12% (94/44) | Sets Win/Loss | 68.72% (468/213) |
| 58.82% (730/511) | Games Win/Loss | 55.45% (3666/2945) |
| 62.50% (5/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 75.00% (18/6) |
| 72.34% (34/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 72.36% (144/55) |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 58.33% (7/5) | Slam W/L | 74.00% (37/13) |
| 72% (44/61) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 76% (225/295) |
| 63% (10/16) | Deciding Set Win % | 80% (72/90) |
| 91% (44/40) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 97% (185/179) |
| 9% (44/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 3% (185/6) |
| 24% (17/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 41% (111/46) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
10:30 PM 11/11/25
Prediction
L. MusettiA. D. MinaurW1
2.12
W2
1.76
02:30 AM 12/11/25
Prediction
L. Draxl1M. ArseneaultqW1
1.069
W2
6.55
04:00 PM 12/11/25
Prediction
B. SheltonF. A. AliassimeW1
1.76
W2
2.12
12:30 AM 12/11/25
Prediction
J. C. P. AngeloNG
T. B. Vera8W1
2.68
W2
1.4
10:30 PM 11/11/25
Prediction
J. L. R. D. Silva
F. MenaqW1
1.39
W2
2.72
08:30 PM 11/11/25
PredictionS. Kozlov
L. BorgW1
1.39
W2
2.72
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
11 Nov 2025
Lorenzo Musetti vs Alex De Minaur Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Lorenzo Musetti vs Alex De Minaur Betting Tips & Picks November 11, 2025
11 Nov 2025
Daniel Dutra Da Silva vs Emilio Nava Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Viktor Durasovic vs Shintaro Mochizuki Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Taylor Fritz Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Jan-Lennard Struff vs Beibit Zhukayev Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
Taylor FritzAlex De MinaurH2H 5-5
Jannik Sinner
Alexander Zverev22:30
H2H 5-4
Jannik SinnerBen SheltonH2H 7-1
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Orlando
United States
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal