M. Linette
To Win
M. Sakkari
To Win
Maria Sakkari vs Suzan Lamens Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L W L W L L W
Form
W L L W W W W W L LHead To Head: Sakkari 0 - 0 Lamens
| Sakkari | Stats | Lamens |
|---|---|---|
| 38% (8-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 58% (15-11) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 82 | Ranking | 73 |
| 3 | Highest Rank | 64 |
| 29 | Age | 25 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 9 | Titles | 8 |
| 60% (482-322) | Career Total W/L | 58% (300-218) |
| $9,138,682 | Career Prize Money | $426,753 |
Upcoming Match
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Baez VS Dzumhur PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shnaider VS Sevastova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Maria Sakkari Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Maria Sakkari
Player
Xinyu Wang
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Maria Sakkari
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
6-0 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Qinwen Zheng
Player
Maria Sakkari
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Sakkari
Player
Marina Stakusic
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
22 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Cori Gauff
Player
Maria Sakkari
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Sakkari
Player
Lucia Bronzetti
55%
(
59 of
108)
1st Serve %
62%
(
65 of
105)
10
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
55%
(
27 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
37 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
111
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Cori Gauff
Player
Maria Sakkari
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
2
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
6
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
77
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Sakkari
Player
Viktoriya Tomova
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
26%
(
5 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
47%
(
24 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zeynep Sonmez
Player
Maria Sakkari
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Maria Sakkari
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
74%
(
43 of
58)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Suzan Lamens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Suzan Lamens
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Olga Danilovic
Player
Suzan Lamens
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
24 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Linda Noskova
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Bianca Vanessa Andreescu
59%
(
55 of
94)
1st Serve %
67%
(
73 of
109)
2
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
1
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
44 of
73)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
95
|
6-1 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Katie Boulter
106%
(
69 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Tatjana Maria
117%
(
70 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
1
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Suzan Lamens
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Rybakina
Player
Suzan Lamens
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Marie Bouzkova
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
95)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
10
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (482/322) | Win/Loss | 58% (300/218) |
| 59% (1077/763) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (664/521) |
| 53% (8949/7789) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5717/5072) |
| 59% (241/168) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (80/67) |
| 63% (180/107) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (187/121) |
| 56% (32/25) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (32/24) |
| 57% (29/22) | Grass Win/Loss | 14% (1/6) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 1672 | Aces Total | 845 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.47 |
| 1754 | Total Double Faults | 2447 |
| 1:7:8 | Average Match Time | 1:29:15 |
| 382.48 | Average Opponent Rank | 428.41 |
| 62% (23190/37569) | 1st Serve % | 59% (18268/31021) |
| 64% (14954/23190) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (11281/18221) |
| 47% (6791/14367) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (5469/12825) |
| 45% (2049/4577) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (2100/4135) |
| 44% (16627/37611) | Return Points Win % | 48% (14961/31166) |
| 61% (58/37) | Slam W/L | 25% (3/9) |
| 59% (98/67) | Masters W/L | 40% (4/6) |
| 44% (4/5) | Cups W/L | 73% (11/4) |
| 55% (120/99) | Main Tour W/L | 54% (27/23) |
| 59% (85/58) | Challenger W/L | 62% (166/101) |
| 68% (117/56) | Futures W/L | 54% (89/75) |
| 60% (475/792) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (297/514) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 55% (89/161) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (48/97) |
| 51% (120/236) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (85/151) |
| 88% (477/418) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (274/248) |
| 12% (477/59) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (274/26) |
| 20% (327/64) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (244/52) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
