Margot Yerolymos vs Ceylin Ipek Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Yerolymos vs Ipek analysis and find out who is favored!
Margot Yerolymos vs Ceylin Ipek Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Yerolymos has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Ipek has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Yerolymos, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ipek has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Yerolymos has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ipek has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Yerolymos has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Ipek winning 33.33% (W/L 3/ 6) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Yerolymos has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 39/ 20), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 49/ 54). Ipek has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 27% (W/L 3/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Yerolymos winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Yerolymos winning 2 and Ipek winning 0. The last match between Yerolymos and Ipek was at the W25 Istanbul, 25-10-2020, Q1 round, I.hard with Margot Yerolymos getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Yerolymos and Ipek have played a deciding set 0 times, with Yerolymos winning 0 times and Ipek 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Yerolymos winning 0, and Ipek 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Yerolymos has played against opponents with an average rank of while Ipek has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Yerolymos has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ipek has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Yerolymos has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ipek has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Yerolymos 1 - 0 Ipek
5
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
858
Rank
306
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
17
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
57% (246-183)
Career Total W/L
23% (3-10)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-3)
$22,359
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Margot Yerolymos | Ceylin Ipek |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 0 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-0 6-0 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Margot Yerolymos | Ceylin Ipek |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/6) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 18% (8/36) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Margot Yerolymos Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Flavie Brugnone
Player
Margot Yerolymos
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
55%
(
60 of
110)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
110)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
6-2 6-7(6) 10-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mallaurie Noel
Player
Margot Yerolymos
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
67)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Margot Yerolymos
Player
Ivonne Cavalle-Reimers
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Margot Yerolymos
Player
Jenny Lim
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
26%
(
6 of
23)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
89)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Margot Yerolymos
Player
Amira Ben Aissa
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Celine Naef
Player
Margot Yerolymos
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Margot Yerolymos
Player
Veronika Podrez
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Margot Yerolymos
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
47%
(
20 of
43)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Margot Yerolymos
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
75)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sara Cakarevic
Player
Margot Yerolymos
76%
(
71 of
94)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
77)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
9
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
30%
(
7 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
47%
(
44 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Ceylin Ipek Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Sofia Rocchetti
Player
Ceylin Ipek
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
21 of
37)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
56
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 3-6 6-1 11-9 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Andjela Lazarevic
Player
Ceylin Ipek
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Bianca Elena Barbulescu
Player
Ceylin Ipek
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve %
45%
(
17 of
38)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 3-6 6-4 10-1 | H2H |
view more