Marek Gengel vs Ruben Bemelmans Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gengel vs Bemelmans analysis and find out who is favored!
Marek Gengel vs Ruben Bemelmans Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gengel has won 53.88% of points on his second serve, while Bemelmans has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gengel, in recent form, has won 55.26% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bemelmans has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.82% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gengel has saved 62.8% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bemelmans has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gengel has won 56.6% of matches played (W/L 30/ 23), with Bemelmans winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gengel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 196/ 104), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Bemelmans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 173/ 130), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 79/ 84).
- Player level: In the last year, Gengel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 71.43% of matches (W/L 30/ 12), where as Bemelmans has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gengel winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gengel winning 2 and Bemelmans winning 0. The last match between Gengel and Bemelmans was at the Biel Challenger, 22-03-2022, First, I.hard with Marek Gengel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:26:27.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gengel and Bemelmans have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gengel winning 0 times and Bemelmans 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Gengel winning 2, and Bemelmans 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gengel has played against opponents with an average rank of 116.13 while Bemelmans has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gengel has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bemelmans has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gengel has converted 47.19% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bemelmans has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gengel 1 - 0 Bemelmans
11
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
11
Minor
583
Rank
256
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
841
Rank
84
High
36
Age
L
Plays
20
Total
0
Mast
6
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
14
Minor
Form
57% (297-227)
Career Total W/L
57% (552-419)
81% (21-5)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,280
Career Prize Money
$1,013,488
3
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Marek Gengel | Ruben Bemelmans |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 14 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 11 | 4 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:26:27 | 1:26:27 |
1st Serve % | 69% (57/83) | 55% (38/69) |
1st Serve Win% | 77% (44/57) | 71% (27/38) |
2nd Serve Win% | 58% (15/26) | 74% (23/31) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Return Points W% | 28% (19/69) | 29% (24/83) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(4) 7-6(3) |
Marek Gengel
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
11
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
24 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
19 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Marek Gengel | Ruben Bemelmans |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 81% (21/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 78% (43/12) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 60% (303/202) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 81% (21/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.48 | 0 |
Aces Total | 120 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.2 | 0 |
DFs Total | 50 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 87.77 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 69% (1054/1526) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 74% (776/1054) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 54% (254/471) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 49% (86/176) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 43% (684/1585) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 81% (21/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 84% (21/25) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 95% (21/20) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 5% (21/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Marek Gengel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Marek Gengel
Player
Ben Jones
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
80%
(
39 of
49)
8
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
5 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marek Gengel
Player
Stijn Pel
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Marek Gengel
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Marek Gengel
Player
Karim Ibrahim
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marek Gengel
Player
Ali Habib
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
46%
(
41 of
89)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Marek Gengel
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Marek Gengel
Player
Fryderyk Lechno-Wasiutynski
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve %
73%
(
45 of
62)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marek Gengel
Player
Ali Habib
70%
(
60 of
86)
1st Serve %
53%
(
45 of
85)
7
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
30 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Illya Beloborodko
Player
Marek Gengel
55%
(
12 of
22)
1st Serve %
53%
(
9 of
17)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
8 of
12)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
7 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
21
Total Points Won
17
|
4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
F |
Marek Gengel
Player
Niels Visker
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Ruben Bemelmans Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
25 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
23 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Zizou Bergs
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Zhizhen Zhang
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
49%
(
50 of
102)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
93
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Henry Patten
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
10
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
34 of
41)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
16 of
57)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Charles Broom
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Daniel Little
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
61
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Michael Shaw
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
6
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
39 of
50)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more