Marcus McDaniel vs Nathan Ponwith Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. McDaniel vs N. Ponwith

Marcus McDaniel
USA
l
w
w
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
23
Age
27
-
Height
6'2" (188 cm)
0
C. Rank
874
0
Best Rank
367
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
Right-Handed

Nathan Ponwith
USA
l
w
l
w
l
l
w
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
23
Age
27
-
Height
6'2" (188 cm)
0
C. Rank
874
0
Best Rank
367
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: McDaniel 1 - 0 Ponwith
They have played 2 sets in total, with Marcus McDaniel winning 2 and Nathan Ponwith winning 0. The last match between Marcus McDaniel and Nathan Ponwith was at the M25 Harlingen, 25-10-2023, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Marcus McDaniel getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| McDaniel | 1 |
| Ponwith | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Harlingen(10-25-23)
Marcus McDaniel
7
6
Nathan Ponwith
5
4
M. McDaniel vs N. Ponwith H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 62.50% (25-15) | Career Total W/L | 52.34% (190-173) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. McDaniel vs N. Ponwith Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Marcus McDaniel has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Nathan Ponwith has won 42.52%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Marcus McDaniel, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nathan Ponwith has won 42.25%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 26.90% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Marcus McDaniel has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nathan Ponwith has saved 55.26% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Marcus McDaniel has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Nathan Ponwith winning 32.43% (W/L 12/25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Marcus McDaniel has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 75% (W/L 3/1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 20/13). Nathan Ponwith has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 75% (W/L 40/32), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 34% (W/L 10/19).
- Player level: In the last year, Marcus McDaniel has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Nathan Ponwith has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 29.03% of matches (W/L 9/22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Marcus McDaniel winning 1 times and Nathan Ponwith being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Marcus McDaniel winning 2 and Nathan Ponwith winning 0.
- The last match between Marcus McDaniel and Nathan Ponwith was at the M25 Harlingen, 25-10-2023, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Marcus McDaniel getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:46:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Marcus McDaniel has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Nathan Ponwith has played against players with an average rank of 417.57.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Marcus McDaniel has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nathan Ponwith has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Marcus McDaniel has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nathan Ponwith has converted 25.00% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Marcus McDaniel vs Nathan Ponwith Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. McDaniel vs N. Ponwith H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 14 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:46:0 | Average Match Time | 1:46:0 |
| 61% (41/67) | 1st Serve % | 52% (34/65) |
| 80% (33/41) | 1st Serve Win % | 82% (28/34) |
| 62% (16/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (15/31) |
| 50% (2/4) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/7) |
| 34% (22/65) | Return Points Win % | 27% (18/67) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: McDaniel 0%, Ponwith 48%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: McDaniel 0%, Ponwith 49%.
Break Points Saved %: McDaniel 0%, Ponwith 61%.
M. McDaniel Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(2) 6-0 | ||
R2 | L | 5-7 6-3 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 1-6 5-3 ret. | ||
Q3 | L | 3-6 6-3 10-7 | ||
N. Ponwith Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 7-5 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 7-6(6) 6-2 | ||

M. McDaniel vs N. Ponwith Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.50% (25/15) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.34% (190/173) |
| 60.23% (53/35) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.56% (430/404) |
| 54.93% (451/370) | Games Win/Loss | 50.74% (3953/3838) |
| 60.61% (20/13) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.44% (140/122) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.56% (40/32) |
| 75.00% (3/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 34.48% (10/19) |
| 0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 119 | Aces Total | 746 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 72 | Total Double Faults | 987 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:19:34 |
| 236.82 | Average Opponent Rank | 402.45 |
| 59% (897/1529) | 1st Serve % | 57% (10390/18072) |
| 69% (622/897) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (6870/10390) |
| 51% (320/632) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3797/7682) |
| 32% (51/160) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (698/1700) |
| 38% (585/1546) | Return Points Win % | 39% (6797/17556) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 29.41% (20/48) |
| 64.10% (25/14) | Futures W/L | 57.63% (170/125) |
| 62% (24/39) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (189/360) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 60% (3/5) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (40/83) |
| 56% (5/9) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (58/108) |
| 85% (26/22) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (194/160) |
| 15% (26/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (194/34) |
| 14% (14/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (169/29) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
03:30 AM 17/11/25
Prediction01:30 PM 17/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 17/11/25
Prediction02:05 AM 17/11/25
Prediction10:00 AM 17/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
02:05
H2H 0-0
02:05
H2H 0-0
04:00
H2H 0-0
05:00
H2H 0-0
05:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal