Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Marcel Zielinski vs Karl Friberg Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zielinski vs Friberg analysis and find out who is favored!
Marcel Zielinski vs Karl Friberg Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zielinski has won 46.59% of points on his second serve, while Friberg has won 46.92%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zielinski, in recent form, has won 48.87% of his opponent's second serve points, while Friberg has won 51.49%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.71% and 33.43% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zielinski has saved 46.03% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Friberg has saved 57.63% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zielinski has won 46.51% of matches played (W/L 20/ 23), with Friberg winning 59.32% (W/L 35/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zielinski has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 7/ 4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 59/ 41). Friberg has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 55/ 40), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 110/ 86).
- Player level: In the last year, Zielinski has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 46.51% of matches (W/L 20/ 23), where as Friberg has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.68% of matches (W/L 28/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zielinski winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Zielinski winning 2 and Friberg winning 1. The last match between Zielinski and Friberg was at the M15 Lambermont, 25-08-2022, Second, Clay with Marcel Zielinski getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zielinski and Friberg have played a deciding set 1 times, with Zielinski winning 1 times and Friberg 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Zielinski winning 0, and Friberg 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zielinski has played against opponents with an average rank of 125.12 while Friberg has played against players with an average rank of 203.39.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zielinski has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Friberg has won 61% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zielinski has converted 37.63% of breakpoint opportunities, and Friberg has converted 42.74% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zielinski 1 - 0 Friberg
741
Rank
700
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
433
Rank
355
High
25
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
59% (66-45)
Career Total W/L
57% (222-169)
20% (2-8)
YTD W/L
50% (3-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$3,475
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Marcel Zielinski | Karl Friberg |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 18 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 3:0:0 | 3:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (51/88) | 64% (67/105) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (40/51) | 67% (45/67) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (21/37) | 39% (15/38) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 100% (2/2) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (45/105) | 31% (27/88) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(7) 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Marcel Zielinski
Player
Karl Friberg
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
64%
(
67 of
105)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
45 of
67)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
27 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
105)
106
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Marcel Zielinski | Karl Friberg |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 20% (2/8) | 50% (3/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 20% (4/16) | 43% (6/8) |
| Games Win/Loss | 36% (62/110) | 47% (64/71) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 20% (2/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.02 | 0.41 |
| Aces Total | 2 | 27 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 19 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:36 | 2:1:38 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 192.4 | 402.17 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (385/597) | 58% (258/442) |
| 1st Serve W% | 50% (191/385) | 65% (167/258) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (99/212) | 46% (85/184) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (22/58) | 45% (18/40) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (208/542) | 40% (183/452) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 20% (2/8) | 75% (3/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 20% (2/10) | 50% (3/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Marcel Zielinski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Marcel Zielinski
52%
(
15 of
29)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
93%
(
14 of
15)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Pietri
Player
Marcel Zielinski
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
74%
(
26 of
35)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
46
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kane Bonsach Ganley
Player
Marcel Zielinski
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(6) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcel Zielinski
Player
Benjamin Pietri
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
81%
(
17 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jiri Barnat
Player
Marcel Zielinski
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
74%
(
34 of
46)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcel Zielinski
Player
John Sperle
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ioan Alexandru Chirita
Player
Marcel Zielinski
54%
(
42 of
78)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
82
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordi Garcia Mestre
Player
Marcel Zielinski
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Bagnolini
Player
Marcel Zielinski
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
78%
(
42 of
54)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oscar Jose Gutierrez
Player
Marcel Zielinski
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
44%
(
20 of
45)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Karl Friberg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Thiago Moura Monteiro
Player
Karl Friberg
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
9
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Karl Friberg
49%
(
23 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Karl Friberg
Player
Michiel De Krom
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
8
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Karl Friberg
Player
Kristjan Tamm
56%
(
45 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
4
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karl Friberg
Player
Hayato Matsuoka
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
57%
(
69 of
122)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
44%
(
44 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
57 of
122)
114
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(2) 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
Player
Karl Friberg
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
9
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Karl Friberg
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karl Friberg
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
66%
(
65 of
99)
1st Serve %
52%
(
55 of
106)
7
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
106)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Karl Friberg
Player
Aleksandr Braynin
61%
(
64 of
105)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
84)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
42 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
100
Total Points Won
89
|
5-7 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Karl Friberg
Player
Tiago Pereira
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Zielinski Vs Friberg Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
