Prediction of Mara Eijkenboom vs Lisa Weerasekera Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Eijkenboom vs L. Weerasekera

Mara Eijkenboom

NED

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

330

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Lisa Weerasekera

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

330

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Eijkenboom 1 - 0 Weerasekera

They have played 2 sets in total, with Mara Eijkenboom winning 2 and Lisa Weerasekera winning 0. The last match between Mara Eijkenboom and Lisa Weerasekera was at the ITF Brindisi, 29-06-1987, Round: R4, Surface: Clay, with Mara Eijkenboom getting the victory 6-2 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Eijkenboom	1
Weerasekera	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R4) ITF Brindisi(06-29-87)

Stats

Mara Eijkenboom

Lisa Weerasekera

M. Eijkenboom vs L. Weerasekera H2H Profile

M. Eijkenboom	Stats	L. Weerasekera
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
56.18% (50-39)	Career Total W/L	20.00% (8-32)
1	Clay	0
1	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Eijkenboom vs L. Weerasekera Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mara Eijkenboom has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Lisa Weerasekera has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mara Eijkenboom, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lisa Weerasekera has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Mara Eijkenboom has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lisa Weerasekera has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Mara Eijkenboom has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Lisa Weerasekera winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Mara Eijkenboom has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 17/9), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 30/27). Lisa Weerasekera has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 65% (W/L 1/1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 10% (W/L 2/18).
Player level: In the last year, Mara Eijkenboom has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Lisa Weerasekera has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mara Eijkenboom winning 1 times and Lisa Weerasekera being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mara Eijkenboom winning 2 and Lisa Weerasekera winning 0.
The last match between Mara Eijkenboom and Lisa Weerasekera was at the ITF Brindisi, 29-06-1987, Round: R4, Surface: Clay, with Mara Eijkenboom getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mara Eijkenboom has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Lisa Weerasekera has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mara Eijkenboom has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lisa Weerasekera has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Mara Eijkenboom has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lisa Weerasekera has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Mara Eijkenboom vs Lisa Weerasekera Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Eijkenboom vs L. Weerasekera H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Eijkenboom	Stats	L. Weerasekera
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	6
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Eijkenboom Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
ITF Cascais 2 - 11-06-1990
R3 Els CallensE. Callens	L	1-6 6-1 6-3	Stats
ITF Lisbon 2 - 04-06-1990
R3 Teresa StrombergT. Stromberg	W	6-3 3-6 6-4	Stats
Katja OeljeklausK. Oeljeklaus	L	6-0 6-2	Stats
R4 Sofie LinnerS. Linner	W	6-4 6-2	Stats
ITF Moulins - 19-03-1990
Q2 Catarina BernsteinC. Bernstein	L	6-2 6-4	Stats

View All

L. Weerasekera Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
ITF Fayetteville - 14-08-1995
Q1 Renata BaranskiR. Baranski	L	6-2 6-0	Stats
ITF Brindisi - 19-06-1989
Q1 Patricia MillerP. Miller	L	6-3 7-5	Stats
ITF Canberra - 27-02-1989
R3 Kristin GodridgeK. Godridge	L	6-3 6-0	Stats
Adelaide - 28-11-1988
Q1 Louise StaceyL. Stacey	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
ITF Adelaide 2 - 21-11-1988
R3 Sabine AppelmansS. Appelmans	L	6-2 7-5	Stats

View All

M. Eijkenboom vs L. Weerasekera Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Eijkenboom	Stats	L. Weerasekera
56.18% (50/39)	YTD Win/Loss	20.00% (8/32)
55.96% (108/85)	Sets Win/Loss	24.42% (21/65)
51.96% (901/833)	Games Win/Loss	37.40% (276/462)
65.38% (17/9)	Hard Win/Loss	25.00% (3/9)
52.63% (30/27)	Clay Win/Loss	10.00% (2/18)
50.00% (3/3)	Indoor Hard W/L	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	Grass Win/Loss	33.33% (2/4)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
481.19	Average Opponent Rank	374.48
56.18% (50/39)	Challenger W/L	18.92% (7/30)
0% (0/0)	Futures W/L	50.00% (1/1)
58% (50/86)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	20% (8/40)
50% (2/4)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/1)
60% (12/20)	Deciding Set Win %	17% (1/6)
90% (52/47)	1st Set Won, Won Match	88% (8/7)
10% (52/5)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	13% (8/1)
9% (35/3)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	3% (32/1)