Mao Mushika vs Roisin Gilheany Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Mushika vs R. Gilheany

Mao Mushika
JPN
w
w
l
w
w
w
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
20
Age
20
-
Height
-
838
C. Rank
0
718
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Roisin Gilheany
AUS
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
20
Age
20
-
Height
-
838
C. Rank
0
718
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Mushika 1 - 0 Gilheany
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mao Mushika winning 2 and Roisin Gilheany winning 0. The last match between Mao Mushika and Roisin Gilheany was at the W15 Wellington, 12-12-2023, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Mao Mushika getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mushika | 1 |
| Gilheany | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Wellington(12-12-23)
Mao Mushika
6
6
Roisin Gilheany
3
0
M. Mushika vs R. Gilheany H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 58.16% (82-59) | Career Total W/L | 42.31% (11-15) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Mushika vs R. Gilheany Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mao Mushika has won 40.04% of points on their second serve, while Roisin Gilheany has won 43.18%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mao Mushika, in recent form, has won 53.51% of their opponent's second serve points, while Roisin Gilheany has won 61.29%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.04% and 33.82% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mao Mushika has saved 53.17% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Roisin Gilheany has saved 33.33% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mao Mushika has won 68.18% of matches played (W/L 15/7), with Roisin Gilheany winning 25.00% (W/L 1/3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mao Mushika has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 72/50), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/3). Roisin Gilheany has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 6/3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
- Player level: In the last year, Mao Mushika has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 78.95% of matches (W/L 15/4), where as Roisin Gilheany has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50.00% of matches (W/L 1/1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mao Mushika winning 1 times and Roisin Gilheany being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mao Mushika winning 2 and Roisin Gilheany winning 0.
- The last match between Mao Mushika and Roisin Gilheany was at the W15 Wellington, 12-12-2023, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Mao Mushika getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:29:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mao Mushika has played against opponents with an average rank of 543.23 while Roisin Gilheany has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mao Mushika has won 86% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Roisin Gilheany has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mao Mushika has converted 42.65% of breakpoint opportunities, and Roisin Gilheany has converted 30.00% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Mao Mushika vs Roisin Gilheany Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Mushika vs R. Gilheany H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:29:0 | Average Match Time | 1:29:0 |
| 57% (32/56) | 1st Serve % | 45% (21/47) |
| 75% (24/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (16/21) |
| 58% (14/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 31% (8/26) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/1) |
| 49% (23/47) | Return Points Win % | 32% (18/56) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Mushika 45%, Gilheany 43%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Mushika 59%, Gilheany 61%.
Break Points Saved %: Mushika 53%, Gilheany 33%.
M. Mushika Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-2 7-6(3) | ||
Q1 | L | 2-6 6-1 10-7 | ||
SF | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
QF | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R. Gilheany Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 3-6 7-6(0) 14-12 | ||
Q1 | W | w/o | ||
Q3 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 7-5 7-5 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 2-1 ret. | ||

M. Mushika vs R. Gilheany Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.16% (82/59) | YTD Win/Loss | 42.31% (11/15) |
| 56.69% (178/136) | Sets Win/Loss | 46.55% (27/31) |
| 53.12% (1541/1360) | Games Win/Loss | 49.04% (281/292) |
| 59.02% (72/50) | Hard Win/Loss | 16.67% (2/10) |
| 57.14% (4/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 66.67% (6/3) |
| 57.14% (4/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.00% (3/2) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 161 | Aces Total | 64 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 386 | Total Double Faults | 57 |
| 1:23:45 | Average Match Time | 1:1:35 |
| 422.2 | Average Opponent Rank | 380.5 |
| 57% (4002/6994) | 1st Serve % | 58% (617/1055) |
| 61% (2452/4002) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (399/617) |
| 45% (1356/2992) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (173/438) |
| 48% (402/835) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (42/106) |
| 46% (3118/6746) | Return Points Win % | 40% (416/1053) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 46.55% (27/31) | Challenger W/L | 33.33% (5/10) |
| 66.27% (55/28) | Futures W/L | 60.00% (6/4) |
| 58% (80/138) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 42% (11/26) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (12/23) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (4/7) |
| 55% (18/33) | Deciding Set Win % | 17% (1/6) |
| 92% (79/73) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 73% (15/11) |
| 8% (79/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 27% (15/4) |
| 13% (62/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (11/0) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
12:30 PM 20/11/25
Prediction05:30 PM 19/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 20/11/25
Prediction04:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction07:15 PM 19/11/25
Prediction12:30 PM 20/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

18 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Eva Vedder vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

18 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Shintaro Mochizuki vs Federico Arnaboldi Prediction – ATP Bergamo Challenger – 18th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
20:00
H2H 1-0
12:00
H2H 0-0
12:30
H2H 0-0
12:30
H2H 0-0
12:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Santiago
Chile
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M15 Tallahassee
United States
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal