Manon Leonard vs Amelia Paszun Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 11 Oct at 08:34 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Leonard vs A. Paszun

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

POL
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Leonard 1 - 0 Paszun
They have played 2 sets in total, with Manon Leonard winning 2 and Amelia Paszun winning 0. The last match between Manon Leonard and Amelia Paszun was at the W15 Monastir, 12-10-2025, Round: F, Surface: Hard, with Manon Leonard getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Leonard | 1 |
| Paszun | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(F) W15 Monastir(10-12-25)
M. Leonard vs A. Paszun H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $59,115 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 57.18% (203-152) | Career Total W/L | 66.67% (18-9) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 8 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Leonard vs A. Paszun Match Preview:
- Manon Leonard excels in second serve performance, with a recent six-month average of 42.66% compared to Amelia Paszun's 40.48%. Does this give Leonard a slight advantage? It seems likely.
- Amelia Paszun outperforms in return games, winning 54.49% of points on her opponent's second serve and 36.67% on the first serve in recent form. Is this a significant factor? It certainly underscores her return strength.
- Both players show resilience under pressure, with Leonard saving 46.44% and Paszun 45.07% of break points. Can this influence close matches? It's pivotal for in-game dynamics.
- Over the past year, Amelia Paszun has a higher match win rate at 72.00% compared to Leonard's 60.00%. Does this reflect superior overall form? Data suggests so.
- Hard courts are the best surface for both players, with each holding a 68% win rate. Does this neutralize any surface advantage? It would appear so.
- Examining competition levels, Leonard has played mostly in higher-level Challenger/ITF events, while Paszun has excelled in Futures/Satellites tournaments, with win rates of 57.41% and 77.78%, respectively.
- Paszun's opponents typically have a higher average rank (255.52) compared to Leonard's (290.8), suggesting Paszun has faced tougher competition.
- In matches requiring a deciding set, Paszun again edges out Leonard with a success rate of 63% to 57% over the past year.
- Considering current event form is crucial for predictions, but prior stats alone suggest possible outcomes.
Editorial Prediction (October 11, 2025, UTC):
As we anticipate this upcoming match, both players have shown distinctive strengths. Leonard's second serve remains slightly more effective, yet it is Paszun's superior return game that stands out as a decisive factor. With both excelling on hard courts, surface advantage is negated, prompting a focus on other parameters.
Paszun's higher win rate over the past year, coupled with her victories against stronger opponents, gives her a statistical edge. Although Leonard's experience in higher-tier events could offer resistance, Paszun's consistency in key areas points towards her as the more likely victor.
Taking all these factors into account, Amelia Paszun is predicted to emerge victorious in this match.
Manon Leonard vs Amelia Paszun Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Leonard vs A. Paszun H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:36:23 | Average Match Time | 1:36:23 |
| 55% (29/53) | 1st Serve % | 71% (50/70) |
| 69% (20/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (26/50) |
| 58% (14/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (11/20) |
| 36% (4/11) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
| 47% (33/70) | Return Points Win % | 36% (19/53) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Leonard Recent Matches Played
A. Paszun Recent Matches Played

M. Leonard vs A. Paszun Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.18% (203/152) | YTD Win/Loss | 66.67% (18/9) |
| 55.83% (450/356) | Sets Win/Loss | 62.90% (39/23) |
| 51.47% (3758/3544) | Games Win/Loss | 55.31% (323/261) |
| 68.35% (108/50) | Hard Win/Loss | 66.67% (4/2) |
| 29.58% (21/50) | Clay Win/Loss | 70.00% (14/6) |
| 60.16% (74/49) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 407 | Aces Total | 20 |
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 1143 | Total Double Faults | 61 |
| 1:30:59 | Average Match Time | 1:8:6 |
| 438.83 | Average Opponent Rank | 326.37 |
| 59% (12681/21436) | 1st Serve % | 66% (809/1227) |
| 60% (7664/12681) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (459/809) |
| 45% (3954/8755) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (196/418) |
| 51% (1412/2768) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (69/138) |
| 47% (10152/21613) | Return Points Win % | 46% (529/1153) |
| 12.50% (1/7) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55.42% (133/107) | Challenger W/L | 57.14% (4/3) |
| 65.38% (68/36) | Futures W/L | 70.00% (14/6) |
| 57% (199/351) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (18/27) |
| 63% (44/70) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
| 52% (52/100) | Deciding Set Win % | 63% (5/8) |
| 91% (190/172) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 94% (18/17) |
| 9% (190/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 6% (18/1) |
| 19% (165/31) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (9/1) |