Manca Pislak vs Paula Arias Manjon Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Pislak vs P. Arias Manjon

Manca Pislak
SLO
w
l
l
w
w
w
w
l
w
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
28
Age
25
-
Height
-
857
C. Rank
894
500
Best Rank
681
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Paula Arias Manjon
ESP
w
l
l
w
w
l
w
l
w
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
28
Age
25
-
Height
-
857
C. Rank
894
500
Best Rank
681
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Pislak 2 - 0 Manjon
They have played 5 sets in total, with Manca Pislak winning 4 and Paula Arias Manjon winning 1. The last match between Manca Pislak and Paula Arias Manjon was at the W25 Vienna, 26-08-2019, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Manca Pislak getting the victory 6-4 5-7 17-15.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Pislak | 2 |
| Manjon | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) W25 Vienna(08-28-19)
Manca Pislak
6
6
Paula Arias Manjon
2
0
(Q3) W25 Vienna(08-26-19)
Manca Pislak
6
5
17
Paula Arias Manjon
4
7
15
M. Pislak vs P. A. Manjon H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 60.53% (227-148) | Career Total W/L | 53.53% (129-112) |
| 2 | Clay | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 1 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Pislak vs P. A. Manjon Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Manca Pislak has won 35.02% of points on their second serve, while Paula Arias Manjon has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Manca Pislak, in recent form, has won 55.87% of their opponent's second serve points, while Paula Arias Manjon has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.03% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Manca Pislak has saved 41.78% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paula Arias Manjon has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Manca Pislak has won 50.00% of matches played (W/L 12/12), with Paula Arias Manjon winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Manca Pislak has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 200/128), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 29% (W/L 2/5). Paula Arias Manjon has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 106/89), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 23/22).
- Player level: In the last year, Manca Pislak has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.33% of matches (W/L 7/5), where as Paula Arias Manjon has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Manca Pislak winning 2 times and Paula Arias Manjon being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Manca Pislak winning 4 and Paula Arias Manjon winning 1.
- The last match between Manca Pislak and Paula Arias Manjon was at the W25 Vienna, 26-08-2019, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Manca Pislak getting the victory 6-4 5-7 17-15.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:13:30.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Manca Pislak has played against opponents with an average rank of 441.79 while Paula Arias Manjon has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Manca Pislak has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paula Arias Manjon has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Manca Pislak has converted 51.11% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paula Arias Manjon has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Manca Pislak vs Paula Arias Manjon Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Pislak vs P. A. Manjon H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 40 | Games Won | 28 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:13:30 | Average Match Time | 1:13:30 |
| 76% (80/105) | 1st Serve % | 64% (54/84) |
| 53% (42/80) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (30/54) |
| 56% (14/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (17/30) |
| 80% (4/5) | Break Pts Won % | 44% (4/9) |
| 44% (37/84) | Return Points Win % | 47% (49/105) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Pislak 39%, Manjon 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Pislak 59%, Manjon 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Pislak 48%, Manjon 0%.
M. Pislak Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-6(5) 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
QF | L | 6-4 1-6 7-5 | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||
P. A. Manjon Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-1 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 4-6 6-2 6-1 | ||
QF | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||

M. Pislak vs P. A. Manjon Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.53% (227/148) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.53% (129/112) |
| 58.61% (490/346) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.42% (289/252) |
| 54.42% (4073/3412) | Games Win/Loss | 52.11% (2526/2321) |
| 36.36% (4/7) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.11% (23/22) |
| 60.98% (200/128) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.36% (106/89) |
| 63.89% (23/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 156 | Aces Total | 83 |
| 0.39 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 1409 | Total Double Faults | 346 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:18:25 |
| 480.27 | Average Opponent Rank | 498.21 |
| 66% (10013/15218) | 1st Serve % | 71% (8394/11900) |
| 58% (5769/10013) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (4640/8394) |
| 40% (2068/5205) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (1513/3506) |
| 53% (1125/2111) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (759/1501) |
| 50% (7629/15382) | Return Points Win % | 48% (5441/11356) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56.59% (73/56) | Challenger W/L | 42.70% (38/51) |
| 62.86% (154/91) | Futures W/L | 59.87% (91/61) |
| 61% (225/368) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (126/236) |
| 50% (28/56) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (19/36) |
| 59% (55/93) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (30/65) |
| 91% (218/199) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (124/111) |
| 8% (218/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (124/11) |
| 18% (157/28) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (116/17) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
02:00 AM 15/11/25
Prediction10:00 AM 15/11/25
Prediction10:30 AM 15/11/25
Prediction10:30 PM 14/11/25
Prediction08:00 AM 15/11/25
Prediction09:35 PM 14/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
14 Nov 2025
Rebecca Sramkova vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Alexander Zverev vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Montevideo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Adolfo Daniel Vallejo vs Cristian Garin Betting Tips & Picks November 15, 2025
14 Nov 2025
Roman Andres Burruchaga vs Mariano Navone Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
16:05
H2H 12-0
22:30
H2H 6-3
H2H 0-0
02:00
H2H 0-1
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico