Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mananchaya Sawangkaew vs Natalia Siedliska Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sawangkaew vs Siedliska analysis and find out who is favored!
Mananchaya Sawangkaew vs Natalia Siedliska Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sawangkaew has won 45.2% of points on his second serve, while Siedliska has won 39.66%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sawangkaew, in recent form, has won 55.73% of his opponent's second serve points, while Siedliska has won 60.53%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.83% and 40.24% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sawangkaew has saved 53.22% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Siedliska has saved 62.65% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sawangkaew has won 68.66% of matches played (W/L 46/ 21), with Siedliska winning 60.98% (W/L 25/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sawangkaew has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 137/ 64), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Siedliska has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 10/ 7), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Sawangkaew has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.66% of matches (W/L 46/ 21), where as Siedliska has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.17% of matches (W/L 12/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sawangkaew winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sawangkaew winning 2 and Siedliska winning 0. The last match between Sawangkaew and Siedliska was at the W25 Hua Hin, 13-10-2022, Second, Hard with Mananchaya Sawangkaew getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:5:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sawangkaew and Siedliska have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sawangkaew winning 0 times and Siedliska 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sawangkaew winning 0, and Siedliska 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sawangkaew has played against opponents with an average rank of 350.72 while Siedliska has played against players with an average rank of 152.24.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sawangkaew has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Siedliska has won 43% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sawangkaew has converted 45.83% of breakpoint opportunities, and Siedliska has converted 44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sawangkaew 1 - 0 Siedliska
223
Rank
223
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
656
Rank
487
High
28
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
67% (137-66)
Career Total W/L
57% (249-191)
67% (18-9)
YTD W/L
29% (2-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sawangkaew VS Siedliska H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Mananchaya Sawangkaew | Natalia Siedliska |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:5:0 | 1:5:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (35/51) | 60% (35/58) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (24/35) | 57% (20/35) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (8/16) | 26% (6/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 100% (2/2) |
| Return Points W% | 55% (32/58) | 37% (19/51) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Sawangkaew VS Siedliska H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
Player
Natalia Siedliska
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mananchaya Sawangkaew | Natalia Siedliska |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (18/9) | 29% (2/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (40/27) | 40% (6/9) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (337/295) | 47% (67/77) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (18/9) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.31 | 0.15 |
| Aces Total | 95 | 11 |
| DFs per game | 0.34 | 0.41 |
| DFs Total | 104 | 29 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:28 | 1:56:42 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 306.81 | 84.86 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1225/1962) | 70% (374/537) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (796/1225) | 57% (212/374) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (333/737) | 37% (60/163) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (119/257) | 41% (28/69) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (967/2093) | 46% (224/482) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (18/9) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (18/27) | 33% (2/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 69% (9/13) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 87% (15/13) | 50% (4/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (15/2) | 50% (4/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 42% (12/5) | 0% (3/0) |
Mananchaya Sawangkaew Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Haruka Kaji
Player
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
73%
(
62 of
85)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
82
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
68%
(
81 of
119)
1st Serve %
61%
(
72 of
119)
3
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
6
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
30%
(
7 of
23)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
45%
(
54 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
58 of
119)
123
Total Points Won
115
|
6-1 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
Player
Aleksandra Krunic
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
71%
(
66 of
93)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sayaka Ishii
Player
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
82)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
Player
Aoi Ito
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
Player
Miho Kuramochi
61%
(
71 of
117)
1st Serve %
71%
(
83 of
117)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
11
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
46 of
83)
39%
(
18 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
34)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
58 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
62 of
117)
121
Total Points Won
113
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
Player
Hikaru Sato
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chihiro Muramatsu
Player
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
76%
(
85 of
112)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
46%
(
51 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
52 of
106)
113
Total Points Won
105
|
3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ya-Hsuan Lee
Player
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
Player
Maegan Manasse
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
71%
(
68 of
96)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
86
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Natalia Siedliska Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ella Haavisto
Player
Natalia Siedliska
67%
(
74 of
111)
1st Serve %
72%
(
88 of
122)
3
Aces
1
14
Double Faults
2
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
46 of
88)
27%
(
10 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
36%
(
8 of
22)
Break Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
56 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
65 of
122)
120
Total Points Won
113
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalia Siedliska
Player
Yasmine Wagner
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
49%
(
36 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Sevcikova
Player
Natalia Siedliska
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
83)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bianca Elena Barbulescu
Player
Natalia Siedliska
78%
(
76 of
97)
1st Serve %
75%
(
74 of
99)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
46%
(
45 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yifan Sun
Player
Natalia Siedliska
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
7
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasiia Gureva
Player
Natalia Siedliska
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
43%
(
20 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
44
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalia Siedliska
Player
Tamara Curovic
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalia Siedliska
Player
Zhanel Rustemova
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
39%
(
18 of
46)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Piangerelli
Player
Natalia Siedliska
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
48%
(
33 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Sawangkaew Vs Siedliska Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
