Prediction of Mal Sim Park vs Naoko Kijimuta Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Sim Park vs N. Kijimuta

Mal Sim Park

KOR

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

386

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Naoko Kijimuta

JPN

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

386

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Park 1 - 0 Kijimuta

They have played 2 sets in total, with Mal Sim Park winning 2 and Naoko Kijimuta winning 0. The last match between Mal Sim Park and Naoko Kijimuta was at the ITF Kuroshio, 05-10-1992, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Mal Sim Park getting the victory 7-5 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Park	1
Kijimuta	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R4) ITF Kuroshio(10-05-92)

Stats

Mal Sim Park

Naoko Kijimuta

M. S. Park vs N. Kijimuta H2H Profile

M. S. Park	Stats	N. Kijimuta
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
66.67% (50-25)	Career Total W/L	52.29% (114-104)
1	Hard	0
4	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. S. Park vs N. Kijimuta Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mal Sim Park has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Naoko Kijimuta has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mal Sim Park, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Naoko Kijimuta has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Mal Sim Park has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Naoko Kijimuta has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Mal Sim Park has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Naoko Kijimuta winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Mal Sim Park has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 81% (W/L 25/6), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 50% (W/L 2/2). Naoko Kijimuta has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 81% (W/L 11/7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 15/16).
Player level: In the last year, Mal Sim Park has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Naoko Kijimuta has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mal Sim Park winning 1 times and Naoko Kijimuta being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mal Sim Park winning 2 and Naoko Kijimuta winning 0.
The last match between Mal Sim Park and Naoko Kijimuta was at the ITF Kuroshio, 05-10-1992, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Mal Sim Park getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mal Sim Park has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Naoko Kijimuta has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mal Sim Park has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Naoko Kijimuta has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Mal Sim Park has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Naoko Kijimuta has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Mal Sim Park vs Naoko Kijimuta Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. S. Park vs N. Kijimuta H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. S. Park	Stats	N. Kijimuta
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
13	Games Won	7
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

M. S. Park Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
ITF Seoul 2 - 07-06-1993
R3 Kyung Sook YooK. Sook	L	6-2 1-6 6-3	Stats
ITF Seoul 1 - 31-05-1993
R4 Mi Ra JeonM. Ra	L	6-4 2-6 6-1	Stats
R3 Kana HatakeyamaK. Hatakeyama	W	6-4 6-3	Stats
ITF Kuroshio - 05-10-1992
R3 Yoshiko SasanoY. Sasano	W	6-1 6-3	Stats
Nao AkahoriN. Akahori	W	6-2 2-6 6-4	Stats

View All

N. Kijimuta Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Toyota Princess Cup - Tokyo - 21-09-1998
R1 Anke HuberA. Huber	L	6-3 3-6 6-0	Stats
Wimbledon - London - 22-06-1998
R1 Karin MillerK. Miller	W	3-6 6-3 6-4	Stats
R2 Maria Vento-KabchiM. Vento-Kabchi	L	6-0 7-5	Stats
French Open - Paris - 25-05-1998
R1 Julie Halard-DecugisJ. Halard-Decugis	L	6-1 6-2	Stats
Japan Open - Tokyo - 13-04-1998
R1 Yuka YoshidaY. Yoshida	L	6-1 4-6 6-1	Stats

View All

M. S. Park vs N. Kijimuta Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. S. Park	Stats	N. Kijimuta
66.67% (50/25)	YTD Win/Loss	52.29% (114/104)
63.10% (106/62)	Sets Win/Loss	52.30% (261/238)
56.07% (818/641)	Games Win/Loss	51.40% (2331/2204)
57.50% (23/17)	Hard Win/Loss	52.71% (68/61)
80.65% (25/6)	Clay Win/Loss	48.39% (15/16)
0% (0/0)	Indoor Hard W/L	50.00% (11/11)
0% (0/0)	Grass Win/Loss	50.00% (9/9)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
509.27	Average Opponent Rank	337.33
0% (0/0)	Slam W/L	48.00% (12/13)
0% (0/0)	Masters W/L	33.33% (2/4)
57.14% (4/3)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	Main Tour W/L	29.41% (5/12)
67.65% (46/22)	Challenger W/L	58.06% (36/26)
0% (0/0)	Futures W/L	61.11% (11/7)
66% (49/74)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	52% (111/215)
67% (6/9)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	46% (11/24)
60% (12/20)	Deciding Set Win %	44% (30/68)
92% (51/47)	1st Set Won, Won Match	80% (121/97)
8% (51/4)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	20% (121/24)
9% (23/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	16% (95/15)