Prediction of Maja Zivec Skulj vs Miki Yokobori Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Zivec Skulj vs M. Yokobori

Maja Zivec Skulj

GER

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

246

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Miki Yokobori

JPN

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

246

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Skulj 1 - 0 Yokobori

They have played 3 sets in total, with Maja Zivec Skulj winning 2 and Miki Yokobori winning 1. The last match between Maja Zivec Skulj and Miki Yokobori was at the Beijing, 14-02-1994, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Maja Zivec Skulj getting the victory 7-6 2-6 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Skulj	1
Yokobori	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) Beijing(02-14-94)

Stats

Maja Zivec Skulj

Miki Yokobori

M. Z. Skulj vs M. Yokobori H2H Profile

M. Z. Skulj	Stats	M. Yokobori
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
56.03% (144-113)	Career Total W/L	43.97% (62-79)
1	Hard	0
3	Titles	2
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Z. Skulj vs M. Yokobori Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Maja Zivec Skulj has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Miki Yokobori has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Maja Zivec Skulj, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Miki Yokobori has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Maja Zivec Skulj has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Miki Yokobori has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Maja Zivec Skulj has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Miki Yokobori winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Maja Zivec Skulj has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 105/71), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 38% (W/L 3/5). Miki Yokobori has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 17/17), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 22% (W/L 2/7).
Player level: In the last year, Maja Zivec Skulj has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Miki Yokobori has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Maja Zivec Skulj winning 1 times and Miki Yokobori being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Maja Zivec Skulj winning 2 and Miki Yokobori winning 1.
The last match between Maja Zivec Skulj and Miki Yokobori was at the Beijing, 14-02-1994, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Maja Zivec Skulj getting the victory 7-6 2-6 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Maja Zivec Skulj has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Miki Yokobori has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Maja Zivec Skulj has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Miki Yokobori has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Maja Zivec Skulj has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Miki Yokobori has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Maja Zivec Skulj vs Miki Yokobori Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Z. Skulj vs M. Yokobori H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Z. Skulj	Stats	M. Yokobori
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
15	Games Won	16
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Z. Skulj Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Salzburg 25K - 09-12-1996
R3 Sandra KleinovaS. Kleinova	L	4-6 6-3 6-2	Stats
Bad Gogging 25K - 11-11-1996
R4 Magdalena FeistelM. Feistel	W	7-6 6-7 6-2	Stats
Raluca SanduR. Sandu	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
R3 Patty Van AckerP. Van	W	6-2 6-0	Stats
Stockholm 25K - 28-10-1996
R3 Barbara SchwartzB. Schwartz	L	6-2 7-5	Stats

View All

M. Yokobori Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
ITF Manila - 13-11-1995
R3 Shareen Rena LaiS. Rena	W	6-0 6-0	Stats
R4 Chin Bee KhooC. Bee	L	7-5 6-1	Stats
ITF Tianjin - 04-09-1995
R3 Eleni RossidesE. Rossides	L	7-5 6-1	Stats
ITF Maribor - 14-08-1995
Q1 Simona GalikS. Galik	L	2-6 6-0 6-4	Stats
ITF Sopot - 31-07-1995
Q1 Jana PospisilovaJ. Pospisilova	L	6-4 2-6 7-6(2)	Stats

View All

M. Z. Skulj vs M. Yokobori Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Z. Skulj	Stats	M. Yokobori
56.03% (144/113)	YTD Win/Loss	43.97% (62/79)
53.99% (325/277)	Sets Win/Loss	45.00% (144/176)
52.06% (2813/2590)	Games Win/Loss	48.60% (1402/1483)
45.45% (20/24)	Hard Win/Loss	47.30% (35/39)
59.66% (105/71)	Clay Win/Loss	50.00% (17/17)
55.56% (15/12)	Indoor Hard W/L	31.25% (5/11)
50.00% (1/1)	Grass Win/Loss	22.22% (2/7)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
366.86	Average Opponent Rank	433.06
0.00% (0/2)	Slam W/L	0.00% (0/1)
64.67% (108/59)	Challenger W/L	47.47% (47/52)
37.50% (3/5)	Futures W/L	37.50% (3/5)
56% (141/251)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	44% (61/140)
59% (10/17)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	44% (7/16)
57% (54/95)	Deciding Set Win %	45% (18/40)
80% (148/118)	1st Set Won, Won Match	83% (59/49)
20% (148/29)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	17% (59/10)
22% (108/24)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	15% (81/12)