Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Maja Chwalinska vs Lea Boskovic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chwalinska vs Boskovic analysis and find out who is favored!
Maja Chwalinska vs Lea Boskovic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chwalinska has won 50% of points on his second serve, while Boskovic has won 47.64%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chwalinska, in recent form, has won 57.02% of his opponent's second serve points, while Boskovic has won 54.94%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43% and 38.17% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chwalinska has saved 48.69% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Boskovic has saved 58.84% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chwalinska has won 56.9% of matches played (W/L 33/ 25), with Boskovic winning 63.38% (W/L 45/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chwalinska has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 70% (W/L 106/ 45), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 31/ 23). Boskovic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 26/ 13), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Chwalinska has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.26% of matches (W/L 32/ 22), where as Boskovic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.29% of matches (W/L 45/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chwalinska winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Chwalinska winning 1 and Boskovic winning 2. The last match between Chwalinska and Boskovic was at the W25 Selva Gardena, 14-12-2020, First, I.hard with Lea Boskovic getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:4:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chwalinska and Boskovic have played a deciding set 1 times, with Chwalinska winning 0 times and Boskovic 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Chwalinska winning 0, and Boskovic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chwalinska has played against opponents with an average rank of 267.84 while Boskovic has played against players with an average rank of 338.08.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chwalinska has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Boskovic has won 54% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chwalinska has converted 52.1% of breakpoint opportunities, and Boskovic has converted 48.68% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Chwalinska 0 - 1 Boskovic
294
Rank
149
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
217
Rank
210
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
65% (183-97)
Career Total W/L
61% (211-134)
57% (12-9)
YTD W/L
56% (9-7)
$191,800
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Chwalinska VS Boskovic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Maja Chwalinska | Lea Boskovic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 10 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:4:0 | 2:4:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (55/76) | 63% (46/73) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 55% (30/55) | 67% (31/46) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (11/21) | 56% (15/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 38% (5/13) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (27/73) | 46% (35/76) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
Chwalinska VS Boskovic H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Lea Boskovic
Player
Maja Chwalinska
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
72%
(
55 of
76)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Maja Chwalinska | Lea Boskovic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (12/9) | 56% (9/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (28/22) | 56% (20/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (246/213) | 52% (184/168) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (8/5) | 70% (7/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.04 | 0.17 |
| Aces Total | 9 | 30 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 41 | 35 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:53:1 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 289.14 | 252.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (1047/1466) | 68% (781/1157) |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (605/1047) | 65% (508/781) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (208/419) | 48% (181/376) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (102/199) | 46% (57/125) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (750/1563) | 42% (469/1123) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (12/9) | 60% (9/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (11/19) | 56% (9/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 25% (1/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (12/9) | 100% (7/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (12/3) | 0% (7/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 22% (9/2) |
Maja Chwalinska Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Nahia Berecoechea
Player
Maja Chwalinska
63%
(
62 of
98)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
9
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
6-7(5) 6-2 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
93)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
7 of
32)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
48%
(
35 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
54 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-2 5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carole Monnet
Player
Maja Chwalinska
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
79%
(
44 of
56)
-
Aces
-
10
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
49%
(
34 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Jennifer Ruggeri
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
69%
(
63 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
69 of
113)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
49%
(
31 of
63)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
45%
(
41 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
57 of
113)
107
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Maja Chwalinska
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
70
|
1-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Victoria Bervid
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
36%
(
21 of
58)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tatiana Prozorova
Player
Maja Chwalinska
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
77%
(
20 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sinja Kraus
Player
Maja Chwalinska
62%
(
61 of
99)
1st Serve %
66%
(
83 of
126)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
48%
(
48 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
62 of
126)
113
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Angelina Wirges
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
44%
(
19 of
43)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
52
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Lea Boskovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Panna Udvardy
Player
Lea Boskovic
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
76%
(
56 of
74)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
74)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lea Boskovic
Player
Berfu Cengiz
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
84)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniela Vismane
Player
Lea Boskovic
78%
(
67 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(3) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dejana Radanovic
Player
Lea Boskovic
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lea Boskovic
Player
Kristina Mladenovic
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
8
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lea Boskovic
Player
Carolina Kuhl
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lea Boskovic
Player
Martyna Kubka
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikola Bartunkova
Player
Lea Boskovic
50%
(
25 of
50)
1st Serve %
83%
(
48 of
58)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lea Boskovic
Player
Suzan Lamens
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lea Boskovic
Player
Maileen Nuudi
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Chwalinska Vs Boskovic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Lea Boskovic
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
