Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Maia Lumsden vs Chloe Paquet Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lumsden vs Paquet analysis and find out who is favored!
Maia Lumsden vs Chloe Paquet Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lumsden has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Paquet has won 45.64%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lumsden, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Paquet has won 55.4%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 40.45% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lumsden has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paquet has saved 52.36% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lumsden has won 33.33% of matches played (W/L 2/ 4), with Paquet winning 52.78% (W/L 38/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lumsden has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 75/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 5/ 15). Paquet has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 220/ 191), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 4/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Lumsden has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 2/ 3), where as Paquet has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.72% of matches (W/L 29/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Lumsden winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Lumsden winning 2 and Paquet winning 3. The last match between Lumsden and Paquet was at the Joue-Les-Tours, 17-10-2018, Second, I.hard with Chloe Paquet getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:30:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lumsden and Paquet have played a deciding set 1 times, with Lumsden winning 1 times and Paquet 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lumsden winning 0, and Paquet 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lumsden has played against opponents with an average rank of 179.33 while Paquet has played against players with an average rank of 259.44.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lumsden has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paquet has won 35% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lumsden has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paquet has converted 42.35% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lumsden 1 - 1 Paquet
863
Rank
250
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor1
0
Grass0
154
Rank
101
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
55% (149-120)
Career Total W/L
52% (389-362)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
50% (10-10)
$3,400
Career Prize Money
$218,175
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Maia Lumsden | Chloe Paquet |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
| Games Won | 20 | 25 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 9 |
| DFs (Total) | 14 | 11 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:30 | 1:30:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (92/169) | 61% (87/143) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (63/92) | 75% (65/87) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (34/77) | 52% (29/56) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 22% (4/18) | 30% (6/20) |
| Return Points W% | 34% (49/143) | 43% (72/169) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Chloe Paquet
Player
Maia Lumsden
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
56)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
| 3-6 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Maia Lumsden
Player
Chloe Paquet
58%
(
66 of
113)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
7
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
6
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
47%
(
22 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
44 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
92)
103
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Maia Lumsden | Chloe Paquet |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (10/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 49% (22/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (205/194) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 36% (4/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.19 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 38 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.44 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 85 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:50:1 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 293.15 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 58% (753/1295) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 62% (467/753) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (245/542) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 39% (82/210) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (664/1423) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (8/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (10/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 88% (8/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 13% (8/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 25% (12/3) |
Maia Lumsden Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Despina Papamichail
Player
Maia Lumsden
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sabine Lisicki
Player
Maia Lumsden
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
6
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Maia Lumsden
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
50%
(
33 of
66)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oceane Dodin
Player
Maia Lumsden
54%
(
52 of
97)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
7
Aces
7
8
Double Faults
6
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
38%
(
37 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
89
|
7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maia Lumsden
Player
Danielle Daley
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maia Lumsden
Player
Zhuoxuan Bai
66%
(
64 of
97)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
6
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
44 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
89
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tatiana Prozorova
Player
Maia Lumsden
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve %
49%
(
21 of
43)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
51
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maia Lumsden
Player
Ingrid Vojcinakova
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sofya Lansere
Player
Maia Lumsden
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
44%
(
28 of
63)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
7
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
28%
(
5 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maia Lumsden
Player
Veronika Erjavec
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
4
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
3
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Chloe Paquet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Justina Mikulskyte
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Andreea Mitu
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Aurora Zantedeschi
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
77 of
108)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
54 of
108)
110
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(4) 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Chloe Paquet
74%
(
65 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
82%
(
46 of
56)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
21 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Nikola Bartunkova
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
12
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
52%
(
50 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Jessica Bertoldo
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Player
Chloe Paquet
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
83)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
16
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
44%
(
40 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
92
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Chloe Paquet
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
1-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liv Hovde
Player
Chloe Paquet
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Lumsden Vs Paquet Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Chloe Paquet
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
