Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mai Hontama vs Miharu Imanishi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hontama vs Imanishi analysis and find out who is favored!
Mai Hontama vs Miharu Imanishi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hontama has won 43.91% of points on his second serve, while Imanishi has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hontama, in recent form, has won 58.99% of his opponent's second serve points, while Imanishi has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.76% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hontama has saved 54.02% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Imanishi has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hontama has won 56.96% of matches played (W/L 45/ 34), with Imanishi winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hontama has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 185/ 111), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 20/ 16). Imanishi has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 19/ 15), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 9/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Hontama has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.97% of matches (W/L 23/ 16), where as Imanishi has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Hontama winning 2 times. They have played 10 sets in total, with Hontama winning 5 and Imanishi winning 5. The last match between Hontama and Imanishi was at the Japan Women's Open - Hiroshima, 08-09-2019, Q1 round, Hard with Miharu Imanishi getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:45:29.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hontama and Imanishi have played a deciding set 2 times, with Hontama winning 1 times and Imanishi 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Hontama winning 1, and Imanishi 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hontama has played against opponents with an average rank of 201.52 while Imanishi has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hontama has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Imanishi has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hontama has converted 53.64% of breakpoint opportunities, and Imanishi has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hontama 2 - 2 Imanishi
119
Rank
108
High
24
Age
Plays
2
Total2
1
Hard1
0
Clay1
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
853
Rank
187
High
31
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
61% (245-154)
Career Total W/L
54% (292-247)
48% (10-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$394,667
Career Prize Money
$43,722
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mai Hontama | Miharu Imanishi |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 5 | 5 |
| Games Won | 46 | 42 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 19 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:29 | 1:45:29 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (184/310) | 70% (198/284) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 59% (109/184) | 55% (108/198) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (56/126) | 40% (34/86) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (21/37) | 53% (20/38) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (142/284) | 47% (145/310) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (2/4) | 50% (2/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 2-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Miharu Imanishi
Player
Mai Hontama
80%
(
68 of
85)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
88
|
||||
| 6-0 6-2 |
Stats
Miharu Imanishi
Player
Mai Hontama
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
| 7-6(3) 5-7 6-2 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Miharu Imanishi
65%
(
79 of
121)
1st Serve %
65%
(
80 of
124)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
5
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
45 of
80)
38%
(
16 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
15 of
44)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
47%
(
57 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
64 of
124)
128
Total Points Won
117
|
||||
| 6-1 6-0 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Miharu Imanishi
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
21 of
38)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mai Hontama | Miharu Imanishi |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (10/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (23/25) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (223/222) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (10/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.08 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 17 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 48 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:1 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 162.14 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (1113/1555) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (633/1113) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 41% (182/442) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 54% (96/179) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (664/1405) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 55% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (10/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (12/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (12/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Mai Hontama Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriela Lee
Player
Mai Hontama
54%
(
50 of
92)
1st Serve %
72%
(
79 of
110)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
43%
(
40 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
56 of
110)
108
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tamara Korpatsch
Player
Mai Hontama
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
78%
(
53 of
68)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
85
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yafan Wang
Player
Mai Hontama
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
72%
(
68 of
95)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
49%
(
37 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
95)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mccartney Kessler
Player
Mai Hontama
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
80%
(
35 of
44)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
47%
(
22 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Conny Perrin
93%
(
50 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
21 of
38)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marta Kostyuk
Player
Mai Hontama
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
21 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Shuai Zhang
76%
(
57 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
46 of
84)
91
Total Points Won
68
|
5-7 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Claire Liu
75%
(
79 of
106)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
7
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
41%
(
43 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
105
Total Points Won
88
|
6-1 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Laura Siegemund
80%
(
60 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
49%
(
37 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
72
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katerina Siniakova
Player
Mai Hontama
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
35 of
47)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Miharu Imanishi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Axana Mareen
Player
Miharu Imanishi
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miharu Imanishi
Player
Sem Hazes
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
79
Total Points Won
54
|
3-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miharu Imanishi
Player
Emilie Ballintijn
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve %
53%
(
17 of
32)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
7
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
48
Total Points Won
12
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Miharu Imanishi
73%
(
11 of
15)
1st Serve %
25%
(
2 of
8)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
9 of
11)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Rtn Points Won
100%
(
8 of
8)
20
Total Points Won
3
|
5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Silvia Ambrosio
Player
Miharu Imanishi
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Miharu Imanishi
Player
Anna Zyryanova
81%
(
86 of
106)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
14
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
13 of
41)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
49%
(
52 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
57 of
106)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miharu Imanishi
Player
Sylvie Zund
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
22%
(
4 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
74
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miharu Imanishi
Player
Stefania Bojica
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Hontama Vs Imanishi Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
