Maelys Bougrat vs Chelsea Fontenel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 10 Nov at 09:35 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Bougrat vs C. Fontenel

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

SUI
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Bougrat 1 - 0 Fontenel
They have played 3 sets in total, with Maelys Bougrat winning 2 and Chelsea Fontenel winning 1. The last match between Maelys Bougrat and Chelsea Fontenel was at the W50 Heraklion, 10-11-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Maelys Bougrat getting the victory 4-6 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Bougrat | 1 |
| Fontenel | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W50 Heraklion(11-10-25)
M. Bougrat vs C. Fontenel H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 43.85% (107-137) | Career Total W/L | 46.40% (58-67) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Bougrat vs C. Fontenel Match Preview:
- Chelsea Fontenel excels in second serve points, winning 39.37% recently, compared to Maelys Bougrat's 29.17%. This could be indicative of a stronger serve game.
- Maelys Bougrat holds a slight edge in returning second serve points at 47.12%, while Chelsea manages 45.32%. Which player will capitalize on this during extended rallies?
- In terms of breaking serve, Fontenel saves more breakpoints, achieving a 47.26% success rate, better than Bougrat’s 40.79%, suggesting resilience under pressure.
- Over the past year, Fontenel has a higher match win rate at 48.94%, compared to Bougrat’s 43.48%, possibly hinting at more consistent performance.
- Considering surface preference, Fontenel has a higher win percentage on indoor hard courts, whereas Bougrat performs best on clay, where Fontenel struggles more.
- Fontenel primarily competes in higher-level tournaments and wins 51.16% of such matches, compared to Bougrat's 46.15% in lower-tier events, which might provide an experience advantage.
- Although Bougrat has faced opponents with a higher average ranking, Fontenel's experience in deciding sets, winning 50% versus Bougrat’s 33%, could be pivotal in a closely contested match.
- Despite Bougrat's superior breakpoint conversion rate at 62.50% against Fontenel's 44.44%, overall pattern suggests Fontenel might handle varied match conditions better.
Editorial Prediction (November 10, 2025, UTC):
In analyzing the recent performances of Chelsea Fontenel and Maelys Bougrat, several key aspects stand out. Fontenel has shown a stronger ability to win both her second serve points and save breakpoints under pressure. These areas are crucial in tight matches, where service games often swing the momentum.
Although Bougrat demonstrates a capable return game, especially against second serves, Fontenel's experience in higher-level competitions may provide an edge. This nuanced understanding of game pressure is further evident in Fontenel’s ability to perform in decisive sets.
While Bougrat showcases better breakpoint conversion, the overall consistency of Fontenel's game across diverse environments hints at her capability to manage tight situations effectively.
Considering this statistical analysis, Chelsea Fontenel appears likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming match.
Maelys Bougrat vs Chelsea Fontenel Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Bougrat vs C. Fontenel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 12 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:24:32 | Average Match Time | 2:24:32 |
| 65% (57/88) | 1st Serve % | 71% (63/89) |
| 54% (31/57) | 1st Serve Win % | 51% (32/63) |
| 52% (16/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (13/26) |
| 78% (7/9) | Break Pts Won % | 42% (5/12) |
| 49% (44/89) | Return Points Win % | 47% (41/88) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Bougrat Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q3 | W | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-1 | ||
QF | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
C. Fontenel Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-1 | ||
Q3 | L | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 3-6 6-2 6-4 | ||

M. Bougrat vs C. Fontenel Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 43.85% (107/137) | YTD Win/Loss | 46.40% (58/67) |
| 44.05% (237/301) | Sets Win/Loss | 46.85% (134/152) |
| 47.25% (2308/2577) | Games Win/Loss | 49.30% (1329/1367) |
| 43.48% (30/39) | Hard Win/Loss | 46.67% (21/24) |
| 46.50% (73/84) | Clay Win/Loss | 44.64% (25/31) |
| 22.22% (4/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (12/12) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 117 | Aces Total | 186 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 576 | Total Double Faults | 250 |
| 1:2:16 | Average Match Time | 1:22:20 |
| 405.77 | Average Opponent Rank | 453.98 |
| 69% (6975/10169) | 1st Serve % | 65% (4125/6336) |
| 55% (3846/6975) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (2454/4125) |
| 39% (1245/3194) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (978/2210) |
| 49% (619/1263) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (340/756) |
| 46% (4631/10142) | Return Points Win % | 44% (2833/6388) |
| 41.03% (32/46) | Challenger W/L | 46.15% (48/56) |
| 45.18% (75/91) | Futures W/L | 47.62% (10/11) |
| 43% (105/242) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 47% (57/122) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (17/27) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 65% (13/20) |
| 52% (26/50) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (20/39) |
| 90% (108/97) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (56/47) |
| 10% (108/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (56/8) |
| 7% (136/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (69/10) |