Madelief Hageman vs Paula Ormaechea Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 04 Jun at 11:52 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Hageman vs P. Ormaechea

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ARG
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Hageman 1 - 0 Ormaechea
They have played 2 sets in total, with Madelief Hageman winning 2 and Paula Ormaechea winning 0. The last match between Madelief Hageman and Paula Ormaechea was at the W15 Focsani, 05-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Madelief Hageman getting the victory 7-5 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hageman | 1 |
| Ormaechea | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Focsani(06-05-25)
M. Hageman vs P. Ormaechea H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $403,418 |
| 50.18% (137-136) | Career Total W/L | 59.14% (424-293) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 16 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Hageman vs P. Ormaechea Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Recently, Hageman has won 39.16% of points on second serves, while Ormaechea has managed 42.59%. Could this give Ormaechea an advantage? It suggests so, given the high correlation with match prediction accuracy.
- Return Game Strength: Hageman has a slight edge in first-serve returns with 37.58% over Ormaechea's 35.68%. However, Ormaechea leads in winning second-serve return points (53.44% to Hageman's 50.78%). This suggests Ormaechea may be more effective in return games.
- Break Point Defense: Hageman excels under pressure, saving 51.1% of breakpoints compared to Ormaechea's 41.86%. Could this be crucial in tight moments? It certainly increases Hageman's resilience in crucial situations.
- Overall Match Performance: Hageman's win-loss record over the past year is slightly better at 38% compared to Ormaechea's 36.36%. Does this slight difference tilt the balance? Not significantly, but it slightly favors Hageman.
- Preferred Surface: Both players favor clay, but Ormaechea is more dominant with a 64% win rate compared to Hageman's 51%. Clearly, Ormaechea is stronger on clay.
- Event Level Competition: Hageman's matches have mostly been at lower-tier ITF events, whereas Ormaechea competes at higher-level Challenger tournaments with a 50% win rate. Does this imply Ormaechea faces tougher opponents? Yes, possibly enhancing her competitive edge.
- Opponent Quality: Hageman has faced higher-ranked opponents, averaging 387.1 compared to Ormaechea's 490.09. Could this experience benefit Hageman? It's possible, given the higher level of competition.
- Deciding Set Performance: In deciding sets, Hageman has won 40% compared to Ormaechea's 20%. This could advantage Hageman if the match is closely contested.
- Break Point Conversion: Both players have similar conversion rates, with Ormaechea narrowly leading 39.53% to Hageman's 38.95%. This indicates a slight edge for Ormaechea in capitalizing on opportunities.
Editorial Prediction (June 4, 2025, UTC):
When examining recent form and statistical analysis, we observe some notable patterns between Hageman and Ormaechea. Ormaechea demonstrates better second-serve performance and return game effectiveness overall, which could grant her a slight tactical edge.
Additionally, Ormaechea has proven to be more adept on clay, her preferred surface. This surface advantage could play a significant role in the match outcome.
Conversely, Hageman shows strength under pressure, specifically in break point saves and deciding set performance. Thus, if the match becomes tightly contested, Hageman's pressure-handling skills may become significant.
Considering the balance of these factors, and accounting for Ormaechea's superior performance on clay, she emerges as the likely favorite to win the upcoming match against Hageman.
Madelief Hageman vs Paula Ormaechea Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Hageman vs P. Ormaechea H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 5 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:35:47 | Average Match Time | 1:35:47 |
| 58% (30/52) | 1st Serve % | 46% (26/57) |
| 57% (17/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (15/26) |
| 77% (17/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (9/31) |
| 60% (6/10) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (2/4) |
| 58% (33/57) | Return Points Win % | 35% (18/52) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Hageman Recent Matches Played
P. Ormaechea Recent Matches Played

M. Hageman vs P. Ormaechea Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.18% (137/136) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.14% (424/293) |
| 49.60% (312/317) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.23% (946/707) |
| 51.23% (2990/2846) | Games Win/Loss | 53.05% (7937/7024) |
| 40.00% (14/21) | Hard Win/Loss | 44.44% (48/60) |
| 51.74% (119/111) | Clay Win/Loss | 63.57% (370/212) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 21.43% (3/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 23.08% (3/10) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 185 | Aces Total | 620 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 557 | Total Double Faults | 1261 |
| 1:20:31 | Average Match Time | 1:11:9 |
| 338.95 | Average Opponent Rank | 547.06 |
| 65% (8766/13465) | 1st Serve % | 66% (22636/34378) |
| 57% (4983/8766) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (13341/22636) |
| 44% (2067/4699) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (5455/11741) |
| 49% (864/1760) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (2121/4357) |
| 47% (6283/13283) | Return Points Win % | 46% (15878/34273) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 39.53% (17/26) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 29.63% (8/19) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 64.52% (20/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 49.06% (52/54) |
| 37.50% (15/25) | Challenger W/L | 61.34% (238/150) |
| 52.36% (122/111) | Futures W/L | 72.95% (89/33) |
| 50% (136/272) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (419/709) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 20% (9/45) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (70/130) |
| 54% (45/84) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (122/221) |
| 85% (134/114) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (403/351) |
| 15% (134/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (403/51) |
| 17% (139/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (314/74) |