Madelief Hageman vs Laura Rahnel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 29 Jul at 07:59 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Hageman vs L. Rahnel

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win

EST
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Hageman 1 - 0 Rahnel
They have played 2 sets in total, with Madelief Hageman winning 2 and Laura Rahnel winning 0. The last match between Madelief Hageman and Laura Rahnel was at the W15 Savitaipale, 30-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Madelief Hageman getting the victory 6-2 7-6(5).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hageman | 1 |
| Rahnel | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Savitaipale(07-30-25)
M. Hageman vs L. Rahnel H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 50.36% (138-136) | Career Total W/L | 67.57% (25-12) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Hageman vs L. Rahnel Match Preview:
- Hageman has a slightly better second serve performance, winning 40.29% of points compared to Rahnel's 36.93%. Could this be a crucial factor?
- Rahnel shows significant strength in return games, capturing 62.09% of opponents' second serve points versus Hageman's 47.33%.
- When looking at first serve returns, both players are nearly on par, with Hageman at 37.72% and Rahnel at 37.83%.
- Under pressure, Rahnel has a slight edge in saving breakpoints, with a 49.63% success rate compared to Hageman’s 46.6%.
- Rahnel has a higher overall match win percentage over the past year at 69.7%, while Hageman stands at 46.55%.
- Both players have their best career surface win percentage on Clay; Hageman at 52% and Rahnel at a remarkable 71%.
- In terms of match level, Rahnel has succeeded at a higher rate (71.88%) in ITF tournaments compared to Hageman’s 43.18%.
- The quality of opponents faced over the last 12 months shows Rahnel battling against slightly higher-ranked adversaries (average ranking: 290.76) than Hageman (average ranking: 359.78).
- If this match reaches a deciding set, Rahnel seems more adept, having won 67% of deciding sets versus Hageman’s 50%.
- On breakpoint conversion, Rahnel has been more effective, converting 53.49% of opportunities against Hageman's 40.82%.
Editorial Prediction (July 29, 2025, UTC):
The statistics present a fascinating comparison between Hageman and Rahnel, with both showing distinct strengths that could influence the match's outcome.
Hageman's modest advantage in second serve performance may play a role, but Rahnel's superior return game and breakpoint conversion percentage suggest a more aggressive gameplay.
Rahnel's higher overall win rate and success against better-ranked players indicate a potential edge in competitive experience.
On their preferred clay surface, Rahnel's historic win percentage significantly outweighs Hageman’s, emphasizing his strong form playing on clay courts.
Considering all these factors, particularly Rahnel's impressive performance metrics and consistency, Rahnel is favored to win this upcoming match.
Madelief Hageman vs Laura Rahnel Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Hageman vs L. Rahnel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 11 |
| 1:43:21 | Average Match Time | 1:43:21 |
| 70% (44/63) | 1st Serve % | 62% (49/79) |
| 48% (21/44) | 1st Serve Win % | 51% (25/49) |
| 58% (11/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 30% (9/30) |
| 39% (7/18) | Break Pts Won % | 71% (5/7) |
| 57% (45/79) | Return Points Win % | 49% (31/63) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Hageman Recent Matches Played
L. Rahnel Recent Matches Played

M. Hageman vs L. Rahnel Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.36% (138/136) | YTD Win/Loss | 67.57% (25/12) |
| 49.76% (314/317) | Sets Win/Loss | 62.07% (54/33) |
| 51.30% (3002/2850) | Games Win/Loss | 56.50% (474/365) |
| 41.67% (15/21) | Hard Win/Loss | 68.42% (13/6) |
| 51.74% (119/111) | Clay Win/Loss | 66.67% (10/5) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 190 | Aces Total | 10 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.47 |
| 558 | Total Double Faults | 194 |
| 1:20:27 | Average Match Time | 1:1:14 |
| 340.55 | Average Opponent Rank | 19.81 |
| 65% (8802/13514) | 1st Serve % | 61% (858/1400) |
| 57% (5009/8802) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (507/858) |
| 44% (2072/4712) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (191/542) |
| 49% (869/1767) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 55% (107/194) |
| 47% (6311/13331) | Return Points Win % | 50% (710/1414) |
| 39.02% (16/25) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 52.36% (122/111) | Futures W/L | 69.70% (23/10) |
| 50% (137/273) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (24/36) |
| 20% (9/45) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 30% (3/10) |
| 54% (45/84) | Deciding Set Win % | 64% (9/14) |
| 85% (135/115) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 95% (21/20) |
| 15% (135/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 5% (21/1) |
| 17% (139/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 31% (16/5) |