Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Maddison Inglis vs Jelena Stojanovic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Inglis vs Stojanovic analysis and find out who is favored!
Maddison Inglis vs Jelena Stojanovic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Inglis has won 48.52% of points on his second serve, while Stojanovic has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Inglis, in recent form, has won 53.55% of his opponent's second serve points, while Stojanovic has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Inglis has saved 56.98% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stojanovic has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Inglis has won 58.18% of matches played (W/L 32/ 23), with Stojanovic winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Inglis has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 31/ 18), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Stojanovic has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 57% (W/L 4/ 3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 51/ 73).
- Player level: In the last year, Inglis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.42% of matches (W/L 29/ 19), where as Stojanovic has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Inglis winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Inglis winning 2 and Stojanovic winning 0. The last match between Inglis and Stojanovic was at the W25 Mildura, 06-03-2019, First, Grass with Maddison Inglis getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:2:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Inglis and Stojanovic have played a deciding set 0 times, with Inglis winning 0 times and Stojanovic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Inglis winning 0, and Stojanovic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Inglis has played against opponents with an average rank of 289.89 while Stojanovic has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Inglis has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stojanovic has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Inglis has converted 47.69% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stojanovic has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Inglis 1 - 0 Stojanovic
263
Rank
112
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
747
High
27
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
59% (242-171)
Career Total W/L
45% (106-132)
65% (11-6)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$423,460
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Inglis VS Stojanovic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Maddison Inglis | Jelena Stojanovic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:2:0 | 1:2:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 81% (39/48) | 58% (25/43) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (31/39) | 44% (11/25) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (5/9) | 50% (9/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (23/43) | 25% (12/48) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Inglis VS Stojanovic H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Maddison Inglis
Player
Jelena Stojanovic
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Maddison Inglis | Jelena Stojanovic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (11/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (26/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (207/157) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 88% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.35 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 61 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.34 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 60 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:27 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 234.12 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (676/1066) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (454/676) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (196/390) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (67/146) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (550/1202) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 69% (9/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (11/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (10/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (10/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Maddison Inglis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Sayaka Ishii
Player
Maddison Inglis
56%
(
80 of
144)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
90)
5
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
7
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
52%
(
33 of
64)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
44%
(
64 of
144)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
119
Total Points Won
115
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Shiho Akita
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Maddison Inglis
76%
(
57 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maegan Manasse
Player
Maddison Inglis
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Arianne Hartono
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
79)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
10
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Player
Maddison Inglis
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
11
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Sarah Rokusek
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
63
|
5-7 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Amelia Zylberman
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Sakura Hosogi
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
29 of
40)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jelena Stojanovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Jessie Aney
Player
Jelena Stojanovic
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Lulu Sun
Player
Jelena Stojanovic
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lian Tran
Player
Jelena Stojanovic
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jenna Defalco
Player
Jelena Stojanovic
45%
(
37 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
4
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
35 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 0-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jelena Stojanovic
Player
Polina Iatcenko
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
26%
(
5 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
47%
(
32 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 0-6 6-1 16-14 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Morgina
Player
Jelena Stojanovic
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
3
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
1
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Inglis Vs Stojanovic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
