Maddison Inglis vs Emerson Jones Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do both players fare in second serve situations? Maddison Inglis has recently won 42.82% of points on second serve, showing a slight edge over Emerson Jones' 40.15%.
• In terms of returning second serves, Emerson Jones outperforms with a 50.87% win rate compared to Maddison Inglis' 47.65%. Is this an indicator of Emerson's ability to pressure opponents?
• For returning first serves, Emerson Jones again holds an advantage with a win rate of 32.88%, while Maddison comes in at 28.18%.
• When under pressure, Maddison Inglis saves breakpoints at a rate of 49.79%, slightly better than Emerson Jones' 47.29%. Could this imply greater resilience from Maddison?
• Looking at overall match wins over the past year, Emerson Jones shows a stronger performance with a win percentage of 72.22%, compared to Maddison Inglis' 55.56%.
• Both players have excelled on their preferred surfaces: Maddison Inglis on Hard (61%), and Emerson Jones on I.hard (61%).
• In the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, Emerson Jones has a higher win rate of 75.56% over Maddison Inglis' 57.14%. Does this give Emerson an edge in performance level?
• Direct match history suggests Emerson Jones has the upper hand, winning 2 out of 3 previous encounters with Maddison Inglis.
• Match durations between these two average around 1 hour and 42 minutes, pointing to closely fought contests.
• Regarding opponent quality, Maddison Inglis faces slightly tougher competition with opponents averaging a rank of 234.27 compared to Emerson Jones' 278.61.
• If this match extends to a deciding set, Emerson Jones may have the upper hand with a 71% win rate in deciding sets, over Maddison Inglis' 39%.
• Break point conversion statistics show Emerson Jones is more effective with a conversion rate of 40.99%, outpacing Maddison Inglis' 36.08%.

Editorial Prediction (November 30, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match promises a competitive edge, with both Maddison Inglis and Emerson Jones displaying distinct strengths. Maddison's slightly higher success on second serves is countered by Emerson's superior return game.

Through recent tournaments, Emerson Jones has shown stronger momentum, dominating matches more consistently. Her higher success rate in breakpoint conversions further highlights a capacity to capitalize on key opportunities.

The historical head-to-head suggests Emerson has a proven ability to edge out Maddison in tight matches. Additionally, she shows resilience in deciding sets, suggesting an advantage in critical match moments.

Based on current statistics and trends, Emerson Jones appears to be the likely winner in this encounter, leveraging her returning skills and mental toughness in competitive scenarios.