Mackenzie Mcdonald vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Mcdonald vs C. Lam Coleman Wong

Mackenzie Mcdonald

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

5'10" (178 cm)

Height

C. Rank

160

Best Rank

128

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$3.4M

Career Money

$539.0K

Right-Handed

Plays

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

HKG

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

5'10" (178 cm)

Height

C. Rank

160

Best Rank

128

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$3.4M

Career Money

$539.0K

Right-Handed

Plays

Head-to-head: Mcdonald 1 - 0 Wong

They have played 2 sets in total, with Mackenzie Mcdonald winning 2 and Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 0. The last match between Mackenzie Mcdonald and Chak Lam Coleman Wong was at the Nonthaburi 4 Challenger, 28-09-2024, Round: SF, Surface: Hard, with Mackenzie Mcdonald getting the victory 6-3 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Mcdonald	1
Wong	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(SF) Nonthaburi 4 Challenger(09-28-24)

Stats

Mackenzie Mcdonald

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

M. Mcdonald vs C. L. C. Wong H2H Profile

M. Mcdonald	Stats	C. L. C. Wong
$3,431,010	Career Prize Money	$538,970
56.04% (348-273)	Career Total W/L	55.28% (157-127)
1	Hard	0
6	Titles	2
1	Total H2H Matches	0
40.00% (10-15)	YTD Win/Loss	45.45% (5-6)

M. Mcdonald vs C. L. C. Wong Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mackenzie Mcdonald has won 44.86% of points on their second serve, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 45.85%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mackenzie Mcdonald, in recent form, has won 43.96% of their opponent's second serve points, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 44.35%. The same stats for first serve returns are 21.81% and 22.97% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Mackenzie Mcdonald has saved 54.18% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chak Lam Coleman Wong has saved 53.26% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Mackenzie Mcdonald has won 60.27% of matches played (W/L 44/29), with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 48.48% (W/L 32/34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Mackenzie Mcdonald has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 228/160), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 37% (W/L 23/39). Chak Lam Coleman Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 125/88), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 6/8).
Player level: In the last year, Mackenzie Mcdonald has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 71.88% of matches (W/L 23/9), where as Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.28% of matches (W/L 20/19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mackenzie Mcdonald winning 1 times and Chak Lam Coleman Wong being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mackenzie Mcdonald winning 2 and Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 0.
The last match between Mackenzie Mcdonald and Chak Lam Coleman Wong was at the Nonthaburi 4 Challenger, 28-09-2024, Round: SF, Surface: Hard, with Mackenzie Mcdonald getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:11:54.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mackenzie Mcdonald has played against opponents with an average rank of 197.86 while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played against players with an average rank of 201.48.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mackenzie Mcdonald has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 45% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Mackenzie Mcdonald has converted 31.21% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chak Lam Coleman Wong has converted 35.62% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Mackenzie Mcdonald vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Mcdonald vs C. L. C. Wong H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Mcdonald	Stats	C. L. C. Wong
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	7
7	Aces (Total)	5
3	Total Double Faults	2
1:11:54	Average Match Time	1:11:54
74% (43/58)	1st Serve %	62% (32/52)
86% (37/43)	1st Serve Win %	69% (22/32)
53% (8/15)	2nd Serve Win %	55% (11/20)
50% (2/4)	Break Pts Won %	0% (0/2)
37% (19/52)	Return Points Win %	22% (13/58)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Mcdonald Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Jinan Challenger - 06-10-2025
QF Brandon HoltB. Holt	W	6-3 4-6 7-6(7)	Stats
R2 Pavel KotovP. Kotov	W	7-5 6-2	Stats
R1 Harold MayotH. Mayot	W	6-3 7-6(2)	Stats
Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai - 29-09-2025
R1 Quentin HalysQ. Halys	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Q3 Rei SakamotoR. Sakamoto	L	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

C. L. C. Wong Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Jinan Challenger - 06-10-2025
R2 Petr Bar BiryukovP. Bar	L	6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(5)	Stats
R1 Laslo DjereL. Djere	W	7-6(10) 6-2	Stats
Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai - 29-09-2025
Q1 Jason Murray KublerJ. Murray	L	7-6(4) 6-3	Stats
China Open - Beijing - 22-09-2025
Q1 Arthur CazauxA. Cazaux	L	4-6 6-2 7-6(5)	Stats
Chengdu Open - Chengdu - 15-09-2025
R1 Taro DanielT. Daniel	L	6-3 6-2	Stats

View All

M. Mcdonald vs C. L. C. Wong Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Mcdonald	Stats	C. L. C. Wong
56.04% (348/273)	YTD Win/Loss	55.28% (157/127)
55.33% (835/674)	Sets Win/Loss	53.68% (357/308)
51.92% (7505/6951)	Games Win/Loss	51.09% (3295/3154)
58.76% (228/160)	Hard Win/Loss	58.69% (125/88)
37.10% (23/39)	Clay Win/Loss	46.51% (20/23)
57.73% (56/41)	Indoor Hard W/L	42.86% (6/8)
55.41% (41/33)	Grass Win/Loss	42.86% (6/8)
0.37	Aces Per Game	0.51
2583	Aces Total	1596
0.2	Double Faults Per Game	0.19
1412	Total Double Faults	585
1:33:28	Average Match Time	1:31:43
408.53	Average Opponent Rank	362.8
63% (26884/42422)	1st Serve %	60% (10905/18030)
70% (18778/26884)	1st Serve Win %	71% (7743/10905)
51% (7979/15538)	2nd Serve Win %	49% (3477/7125)
42% (1691/4001)	Break Points Won % (Total)	41% (676/1663)
39% (16704/43149)	Return Points Win %	38% (6950/18108)
48.48% (32/34)	Slam W/L	53.33% (8/7)
47.25% (43/48)	Masters W/L	46.67% (7/8)
80.00% (4/1)	Cups W/L	62.50% (5/3)
48.89% (88/92)	Main Tour W/L	27.27% (3/8)
63.93% (140/79)	Challenger W/L	54.39% (62/52)
68.33% (41/19)	Futures W/L	59.50% (72/49)
57% (324/567)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	54% (150/276)
42% (21/50)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	83% (5/6)
50% (103/206)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	54% (53/98)
47% (87/187)	Deciding Set Win %	54% (49/91)
81% (363/294)	1st Set Won, Won Match	87% (149/129)
19% (363/69)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	13% (149/20)
21% (258/54)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	20% (135/27)