Mackenzie Mcdonald vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mcdonald vs Zandschulp analysis and find out who is favored!
Mackenzie Mcdonald vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mcdonald 1 - 1 Zandschulp
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mcdonald has won 43.17% of points on their second serve, while Zandschulp has won 46.27%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mcdonald, in recent form, has won 50.12% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zandschulp has won 49.29%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.67% and 31.02% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mcdonald has saved 45.36% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zandschulp has saved 58.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mcdonald has won 44.19% of matches played (W/L 19/ 24), with Zandschulp winning 48.15% (W/L 26/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mcdonald has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 187/ 136), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 39% (W/L 22/ 35). Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 10/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Mcdonald has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 9/ 12), where as Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 40.91% of matches (W/L 9/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Mcdonald winning 1 times and Zandschulp being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Mcdonald winning 2 and Zandschulp winning 3. The last match between Mcdonald and Zandschulp was at the Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch, 11-06-2024, First, Grass with Mackenzie Mcdonald getting the victory 6-4 4-6 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:45:35.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mcdonald and Zandschulp have played a deciding set 1 times, with Mcdonald winning 1 times and Zandschulp 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mcdonald winning 0, and Zandschulp 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mcdonald has played against opponents with an average rank of 133.95 while Zandschulp has played against players with an average rank of 176.8.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mcdonald has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zandschulp has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mcdonald has converted 37.14% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zandschulp has converted 38.74% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
5
Total
0
Mast
3
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
80
Rank
37
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
96
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
7
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Form
55% (290-235)
Career Total W/L
63% (332-199)
21% (3-11)
YTD W/L
40% (12-18)
$3,147,620
Career Prize Money
$2,900,825
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Mackenzie Mcdonald vs Botic Van De Zandschulp For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Mcdonald VS Zandschulp
Mcdonald VS Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Mackenzie Mcdonald | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
Games Won | 23 | 25 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 11 |
DFs Total | 6 | 10 |
Avg Match Time | 1:45:35 | 1:45:35 |
1st Serve % | 65% (93/142) | 63% (94/150) |
1st Serve Win% | 65% (60/93) | 74% (70/94) |
2nd Serve Win% | 45% (22/49) | 36% (20/56) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 37% (7/19) | 57% (8/14) |
Return Points W% | 40% (60/150) | 42% (60/142) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Mcdonald VS Zandschulp H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 4-6 6-2 |
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
92)
2
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
8
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
41)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
92
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
6-2 7-5 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Mackenzie Mcdonald | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 21% (3/11) | 40% (12/18) |
Sets Win/Loss | 31% (11/25) | 41% (28/41) |
Games Win/Loss | 45% (146/179) | 47% (314/360) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 36% (4/7) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/4) | 47% (7/8) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Grass Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/1) |
Aces pg | 0.16 | 0.4 |
Aces Total | 25 | 130 |
DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.3 |
DFs Total | 44 | 98 |
Avg Match Time | 1:43:48 | 1:47:50 |
Avg Opp Rank | 159.29 | 181.13 |
1st Serve % | 67% (664/986) | 62% (1326/2130) |
1st Serve W% | 64% (427/664) | 68% (906/1326) |
2nd Serve W% | 43% (139/322) | 46% (372/804) |
BPs Won% Total | 37% (39/105) | 39% (74/191) |
Return Pts W% | 38% (389/1014) | 38% (817/2138) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (5/5) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
Main Tour W/L | 25% (2/6) | 38% (5/8) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 33% (1/2) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 25% (3/12) | 44% (12/27) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/2) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 50% (7/14) |
Deciding Set W% | 25% (1/4) | 50% (4/8) |
1st set W, W | 60% (5/3) | 92% (12/11) |
1st set W, L | 40% (5/2) | 8% (12/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (9/0) | 6% (18/1) |
Mackenzie Mcdonald Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
James McCabe
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alexei Popyrin
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Paul Jubb
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
46%
(
18 of
39)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
8
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
92)
2
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
8
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
41)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
92
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
56%
(
50 of
90)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Alex Bolt
83%
(
49 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
56%
(
60 of
107)
1st Serve %
65%
(
67 of
103)
9
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
5
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
57%
(
27 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
43%
(
46 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
103)
110
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 6-4 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Aleksandar Vukic
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H |
view more
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
92)
2
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
8
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
41)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
92
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Fabio Fognini
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
54%
(
41 of
76)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
97
Total Points Won
64
|
6-1 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Arthur Fils
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
47%
(
36 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Quentin Halys
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
66%
(
87 of
132)
1st Serve %
59%
(
71 of
121)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
62 of
87)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
50 of
71)
58%
(
26 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
44 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
121)
129
Total Points Won
124
|
7-5 6-7(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Facundo Bagnis
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Zachary Svajda
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
57 of
100)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
99)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
29 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
99)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 6-7(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Mcdonald Vs Zandschulp Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Mcdonald are available here and Zandschulp photos here.