Prediction of Maciek Sykut vs Gustavo Loza Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Sykut vs G. Loza

Maciek Sykut

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'2" (188 cm)

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Gustavo Loza

MEX

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'2" (188 cm)

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Head-to-head: Sykut 1 - 0 Loza

They have played 2 sets in total, with Maciek Sykut winning 2 and Gustavo Loza winning 0. The last match between Maciek Sykut and Gustavo Loza was at the Mexico F8, 01-11-2010, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Maciek Sykut getting the victory 6-1 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Sykut	1
Loza	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Mexico F8(11-01-10)

Stats

Maciek Sykut

Gustavo Loza

M. Sykut vs G. Loza H2H Profile

M. Sykut	Stats	G. Loza
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
42.76% (62-83)	Career Total W/L	18.52% (5-22)
1	Clay	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Sykut vs G. Loza Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Maciek Sykut has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Gustavo Loza has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Maciek Sykut, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gustavo Loza has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Maciek Sykut has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gustavo Loza has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Maciek Sykut has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Gustavo Loza winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Maciek Sykut has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 46% (W/L 37/43), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 23/35). Gustavo Loza has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 46% (W/L 5/17), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/4).
Player level: In the last year, Maciek Sykut has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Gustavo Loza has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Maciek Sykut winning 1 times and Gustavo Loza being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Maciek Sykut winning 2 and Gustavo Loza winning 0.
The last match between Maciek Sykut and Gustavo Loza was at the Mexico F8, 01-11-2010, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Maciek Sykut getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Maciek Sykut has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Gustavo Loza has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Maciek Sykut has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gustavo Loza has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Maciek Sykut has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gustavo Loza has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Maciek Sykut vs Gustavo Loza Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Sykut vs G. Loza H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Sykut	Stats	G. Loza
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	3
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Sykut Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Cali Challenger - 10-09-2012
Q1 Edwin BuriticaE. Buritica	W	6-2 6-3	Stats
Q3 Juan Sebastian GomezJ. Sebastian	L	6-3 7-6(6)	Stats
Lexington Challenger - 23-07-2012
Q1 Toshihide MatsuiT. Matsui	L	7-6(4) 7-6(4)	Stats
Binghamton Challenger - 16-07-2012
R1 Jamie BakerJ. Baker	L	7-5 6-3	Stats
Q3 Andrew CarterA. Carter	L	4-6 6-2 6-4	Stats

View All

G. Loza Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Mexico F8 - 13-05-2013
R1 Bojan TemunovicB. Temunovic	W	5-7 6-3 6-1	Stats
R2 Eduardo Peralta-TelloE. Peralta-Tello	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Mexico F7 - 06-05-2013
Q2 Yac VerdugoY. Verdugo	W	7-5 5-7 6-1	Stats
R1 Connor FarrenC. Farren	L	6-1 6-2	Stats
Q3 Juan Jose Priego CarriloJ. Jose	W	6-0 6-1	Stats

View All

M. Sykut vs G. Loza Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Sykut	Stats	G. Loza
42.76% (62/83)	YTD Win/Loss	18.52% (5/22)
45.37% (147/177)	Sets Win/Loss	21.67% (13/47)
49.22% (1505/1553)	Games Win/Loss	36.56% (185/321)
46.25% (37/43)	Hard Win/Loss	22.73% (5/17)
39.66% (23/35)	Clay Win/Loss	0.00% (0/4)
28.57% (2/5)	Indoor Hard W/L	0.00% (0/1)
0.04	Aces Per Game	0
64	Aces Total	0
0.04	Double Faults Per Game	0
62	Total Double Faults	0
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
528.63	Average Opponent Rank	463.37
59% (549/926)	1st Serve %	0% (0/0)
67% (368/549)	1st Serve Win %	0% (0/0)
43% (162/377)	2nd Serve Win %	0% (0/0)
44% (35/80)	Break Points Won % (Total)	0% (0/0)
40% (382/963)	Return Points Win %	0% (0/0)
39.39% (13/20)	Challenger W/L	0.00% (0/7)
43.75% (49/63)	Futures W/L	25.00% (5/15)
42% (60/143)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	19% (5/27)
38% (15/40)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
28% (10/36)	Deciding Set Win %	50% (3/6)
83% (66/55)	1st Set Won, Won Match	60% (5/3)
17% (66/11)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	40% (5/2)
8% (79/6)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	9% (22/2)