Maciej Rajski vs David Poljak Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Rajski vs D. Poljak

Maciej Rajski
POL
w
l
w
w
w
w
l
l
l
w
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
34
Age
29
6'4" (193 cm)
Height
6'2" (188 cm)
900
C. Rank
896
532
Best Rank
370
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

David Poljak
CZE
l
l
w
l
w
w
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
34
Age
29
6'4" (193 cm)
Height
6'2" (188 cm)
900
C. Rank
896
532
Best Rank
370
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Rajski 1 - 0 Poljak
They have played 3 sets in total, with Maciej Rajski winning 2 and David Poljak winning 1. The last match between Maciej Rajski and David Poljak was at the Czech Republic F1 (Prague), 18-05-2017, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory 6-4 3-6 7-6(2).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Rajski | 1 |
| Poljak | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Czech Republic F1 (Prague)(05-18-17)
Maciej Rajski
6
3
7
David Poljak
4
6
6
M. Rajski vs D. Poljak H2H Profile
M. Rajski vs D. Poljak Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Maciej Rajski has won 40.63% of points on their second serve, while David Poljak has won 45.49%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Maciej Rajski, in recent form, has won 44.38% of their opponent's second serve points, while David Poljak has won 43.65%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.91% and 26.45% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Maciej Rajski has saved 50.88% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas David Poljak has saved 52.82% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Maciej Rajski has won 61.54% of matches played (W/L 8/5), with David Poljak winning 61.11% (W/L 33/21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Maciej Rajski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 236/156), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/4). David Poljak has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 114/80), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 113/116).
- Player level: In the last year, Maciej Rajski has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.54% of matches (W/L 8/5), where as David Poljak has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.18% of matches (W/L 30/14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Maciej Rajski winning 1 times and David Poljak being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Maciej Rajski winning 2 and David Poljak winning 1.
- The last match between Maciej Rajski and David Poljak was at the Czech Republic F1 (Prague), 18-05-2017, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory 6-4 3-6 7-6(2).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:29:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Maciej Rajski has played against opponents with an average rank of 175.31 while David Poljak has played against players with an average rank of 232.26.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Maciej Rajski has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while David Poljak has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Maciej Rajski has converted 28.57% of breakpoint opportunities, and David Poljak has converted 32.53% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Maciej Rajski vs David Poljak Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Rajski vs D. Poljak H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 16 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:29:0 | Average Match Time | 2:29:0 |
| 71% (72/101) | 1st Serve % | 57% (60/106) |
| 68% (49/72) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (41/60) |
| 59% (17/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (26/46) |
| 33% (3/9) | Break Pts Won % | 38% (3/8) |
| 37% (39/106) | Return Points Win % | 35% (35/101) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Rajski 44%, Poljak 52%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Rajski 51%, Poljak 51%.
Break Points Saved %: Rajski 59%, Poljak 63%.
M. Rajski Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
QF | L | 6-3 4-6 7-5 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
D. Poljak Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Q3 | W | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-0 3-6 6-1 | ||
Q3 | W | 7-5 6-2 | ||

M. Rajski vs D. Poljak Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.90% (268/187) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.86% (350/288) |
| 58.28% (595/426) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.81% (798/685) |
| 53.28% (5038/4417) | Games Win/Loss | 51.74% (7327/6834) |
| 52.00% (26/24) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.76% (114/80) |
| 60.20% (236/156) | Clay Win/Loss | 49.34% (113/116) |
| 46.15% (6/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57.28% (122/91) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.39 |
| 736 | Aces Total | 2689 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 666 | Total Double Faults | 1658 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:23:26 |
| 482.34 | Average Opponent Rank | 517.88 |
| 65% (12198/18680) | 1st Serve % | 60% (22965/38445) |
| 67% (8124/12198) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (16070/22965) |
| 48% (3136/6482) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (7517/15479) |
| 44% (901/2028) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1551/3567) |
| 41% (7865/19025) | Return Points Win % | 39% (14709/37562) |
| 39.29% (11/17) | Challenger W/L | 38.21% (47/76) |
| 60.19% (257/170) | Futures W/L | 58.83% (303/212) |
| 59% (262/442) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (345/632) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 53% (58/110) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (101/198) |
| 48% (57/120) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (108/212) |
| 88% (268/236) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (346/289) |
| 12% (268/32) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (346/57) |
| 17% (187/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (292/59) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
10:30 PM 15/11/25
Prediction09:40 PM 15/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction12:10 AM 16/11/25
Prediction06:20 AM 16/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
15 Nov 2025
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Auger-Aliassime Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Auger-Aliassime H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Sinner Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Montevideo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Ignacio Buse vs Roman Andres Burruchaga Betting Tips & Picks November 15, 2025
15 Nov 2025
Kaja Juvan vs Sahaja Yamalapalli Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group G – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
22:30
H2H 4-3
H2H 0-0
17:45
H2H 0-0
17:50
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Orlando
United States
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico