Luke Hooper vs Sean Hodkin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 20 Oct at 01:22 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Hooper vs S. Hodkin

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Hooper 1 - 0 Hodkin
They have played 2 sets in total, with Luke Hooper winning 2 and Sean Hodkin winning 0. The last match between Luke Hooper and Sean Hodkin was at the M25 Sheffield, 20-10-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: I.hard, with Luke Hooper getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hooper | 1 |
| Hodkin | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) M25 Sheffield(10-20-25)
L. Hooper vs S. Hodkin H2H Profile
L. Hooper vs S. Hodkin Match Preview:
- How effective is each player's second serve? Luke Hooper has a lower success rate on his second serve, winning 39.12% of points, while Sean Hodkin achieves 54.22%.
- Who has the edge in returning second serves? Luke Hooper better capitalizes on opponents' second serves, winning 43.82% compared to Sean Hodkin's 41.11%.
- When dealing with first serve returns, Luke Hooper has a slight advantage with a win rate of 26.48%, just edging out Sean Hodkin's 25.17%.
- In terms of saving breakpoints, Luke Hooper outperforms Sean Hodkin, saving 54.37% compared to 45.00%.
- Looking at overall match wins over the past year, Luke Hooper has a better win rate with 60.00% compared to Sean Hodkin's 55.56%.
- On indoor hard surfaces, Luke Hooper has a strong performance history with a 67% win rate, while Sean Hodkin excels on hard courts with the same 67% win rate.
- Match level and tournament background shows both players mostly compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, with Luke Hooper slightly more successful at 60.00% win rate over Sean Hodkin's 55.56%.
- Considering opponent quality, Sean Hodkin has faced tougher competition, with opponents having an average rank of 162.67 versus Luke Hooper's 243.2.
- What happens if the match goes to a deciding set? Sean Hodkin has a perfect record, winning 100% of deciding sets, compared to Luke Hooper’s 44%.
- Taking all stats into consideration may lead us to favor one player for the upcoming match, influenced by various strengths and recent performances.
Editorial Prediction (October 20, 2025, UTC):
Assessing the recent performance statistics of both players, Sean Hodkin demonstrates a significant advantage with his second serve winning percentage, allowing him to score more reliably.
Although Luke Hooper shows strength in breakpoint saves and better return stats, Sean's capabilities in deciding sets are noteworthy, as is his experience against higher-ranked opponents.
The analysis of surface preference and match-level experience does slightly favor Hooper in more consistent results, but Hodkin's hard court performance and ability under pressure are decisive factors.
Given these considerations, Sean Hodkin is more likely to secure a victory in the upcoming match, largely due to his power on the second serve and consistent performance in high-pressure situations.
Luke Hooper vs Sean Hodkin Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Hooper vs S. Hodkin H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:22:34 | Average Match Time | 1:22:34 |
| 64% (34/53) | 1st Serve % | 71% (40/56) |
| 74% (25/34) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (28/40) |
| 58% (11/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 19% (3/16) |
| 44% (4/9) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (1/4) |
| 45% (25/56) | Return Points Win % | 32% (17/53) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Hooper Recent Matches Played
S. Hodkin Recent Matches Played

L. Hooper vs S. Hodkin Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.89% (44/32) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.13% (170/150) |
| 57.58% (95/70) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.98% (382/339) |
| 53.56% (850/737) | Games Win/Loss | 52.05% (3648/3361) |
| 54.90% (28/23) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.62% (99/79) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 64.00% (16/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 51.18% (65/62) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (6/6) |
| 0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.25 |
| 195 | Aces Total | 858 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 182 | Total Double Faults | 620 |
| 1:8:33 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 217.14 | Average Opponent Rank | 296.81 |
| 59% (1998/3376) | 1st Serve % | 63% (8320/13122) |
| 69% (1388/1998) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (5659/8320) |
| 51% (702/1378) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (2265/4802) |
| 39% (132/335) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (527/1155) |
| 39% (1319/3367) | Return Points Win % | 39% (4907/12646) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 57.89% (44/32) | Futures W/L | 53.63% (170/147) |
| 57% (43/75) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (165/315) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 35% (6/17) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (37/88) |
| 43% (6/14) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (38/84) |
| 91% (47/43) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (166/150) |
| 9% (47/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (166/15) |
| 3% (29/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (154/18) |