Prediction of Luke Bambridge vs Mark Whitehouse Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Bambridge vs M. Whitehouse

Luke Bambridge
GBR
l
l
w
l
l
l
w
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
30
Age
32
6'3" (191 cm)
Height
6'2" (188 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
894
481
Best Rank
523
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$4.7K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Mark Whitehouse
GBR
w
l
l
l
l
w
w
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
30
Age
32
6'3" (191 cm)
Height
6'2" (188 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
894
481
Best Rank
523
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$4.7K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Bambridge 1 - 0 Whitehouse
They have played 2 sets in total, with Luke Bambridge winning 2 and Mark Whitehouse winning 0. The last match between Luke Bambridge and Mark Whitehouse was at the Great Britain F19, 09-09-2013, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Luke Bambridge getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Bambridge | 1 |
| Whitehouse | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Great Britain F19(09-09-13)
Luke Bambridge
6
6
Mark Whitehouse
2
2
L. Bambridge vs M. Whitehouse H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $4,650 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 52.23% (176-161) | Career Total W/L | 50.37% (202-199) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
L. Bambridge vs M. Whitehouse Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Luke Bambridge has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Mark Whitehouse has won 48.90%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Luke Bambridge, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mark Whitehouse has won 45.45%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 27.09% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Luke Bambridge has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mark Whitehouse has saved 55.36% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Luke Bambridge has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Mark Whitehouse winning 53.33% (W/L 8/7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Luke Bambridge has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 32/25), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 9/16). Mark Whitehouse has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 124/115), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 19/22).
- Player level: In the last year, Luke Bambridge has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Mark Whitehouse has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 7/4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Luke Bambridge winning 1 times and Mark Whitehouse being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Luke Bambridge winning 2 and Mark Whitehouse winning 0.
- The last match between Luke Bambridge and Mark Whitehouse was at the Great Britain F19, 09-09-2013, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Luke Bambridge getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Luke Bambridge has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Mark Whitehouse has played against players with an average rank of 270.53.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Luke Bambridge has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mark Whitehouse has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Luke Bambridge has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mark Whitehouse has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Luke Bambridge vs Mark Whitehouse Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Bambridge vs M. Whitehouse H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Bambridge 0%, Whitehouse 45%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Bambridge 0%, Whitehouse 47%.
Break Points Saved %: Bambridge 0%, Whitehouse 53%.
L. Bambridge Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-4 7-6(4) | ||
Q1 | L | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q2 | L | 7-6(5) 6-7(4) 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 7-5 6-4 | ||
M. Whitehouse Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 7-5 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||

L. Bambridge vs M. Whitehouse Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52.23% (176/161) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.37% (202/199) |
| 51.85% (407/378) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.65% (466/454) |
| 50.75% (3878/3763) | Games Win/Loss | 50.60% (4457/4351) |
| 54.17% (91/77) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.88% (124/115) |
| 56.14% (32/25) | Clay Win/Loss | 46.34% (19/22) |
| 50.57% (44/43) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49.44% (44/45) |
| 36.00% (9/16) | Grass Win/Loss | 46.88% (15/17) |
| 0.36 | Aces Per Game | 0.36 |
| 1356 | Aces Total | 1557 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 678 | Total Double Faults | 767 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:9:19 |
| 589.83 | Average Opponent Rank | 451.31 |
| 55% (6930/12637) | 1st Serve % | 65% (13640/21052) |
| 75% (5225/6930) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (9333/13640) |
| 49% (2816/5706) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (3513/7412) |
| 41% (402/973) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (814/1984) |
| 36% (4372/12151) | Return Points Win % | 39% (8078/20892) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 43.75% (42/54) | Challenger W/L | 41.03% (16/23) |
| 56.22% (131/102) | Futures W/L | 51.67% (186/174) |
| 52% (173/334) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (201/398) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (73/133) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (58/123) |
| 49% (55/112) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (58/121) |
| 81% (183/149) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (210/171) |
| 19% (183/34) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (210/37) |
| 18% (154/27) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (191/31) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
08:30 AM 18/11/25
Prediction02:05 AM 18/11/25
Prediction05:30 AM 18/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 18/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction12:30 PM 18/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
01:50
H2H 0-0
02:00
H2H 0-0
02:05
H2H 0-0
02:05
H2H 0-0
03:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Heraklion
Greece