Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Luke Bambridge vs Joshua Ward-Hibbert Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bambridge vs Ward-Hibbert analysis and find out who is favored!
Luke Bambridge vs Joshua Ward-Hibbert Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bambridge has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Ward-Hibbert has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bambridge, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ward-Hibbert has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bambridge has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ward-Hibbert has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bambridge has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Ward-Hibbert winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bambridge has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 32/ 25), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 9/ 16). Ward-Hibbert has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 48/ 33), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 36% (W/L 5/ 9).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Bambridge winning 2 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Bambridge winning 5 and Ward-Hibbert winning 2. The last match between Bambridge and Ward-Hibbert was at the Great Britain F9, 07-09-2015, Second, Hard with Joshua Ward-Hibbert getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bambridge and Ward-Hibbert have played a deciding set 1 times, with Bambridge winning 0 times and Ward-Hibbert 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Bambridge winning 1, and Ward-Hibbert 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bambridge has played against opponents with an average rank of while Ward-Hibbert has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bambridge has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ward-Hibbert has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bambridge has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ward-Hibbert has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bambridge 2 - 1 Ward-Hibbert
Ret.
Rank
481
High
29
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
588
High
30
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
52% (176-161)
Career Total W/L
50% (81-82)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$4,650
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Bambridge VS Ward-Hibbert H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Luke Bambridge | Joshua Ward-Hibbert |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 5 | 2 |
| Games Won | 38 | 30 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/1) |
Bambridge VS Ward-Hibbert H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 6-4 | |||||
| 7-6(3) 6-4 | |||||
| 6-2 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Luke Bambridge | Joshua Ward-Hibbert |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Luke Bambridge Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Luke Bambridge
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
11
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
32 of
41)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Luke Bambridge
47%
(
47 of
99)
1st Serve %
48%
(
50 of
104)
14
Aces
11
13
Double Faults
6
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
46%
(
24 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
104)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Luke Bambridge
71%
(
80 of
113)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
121)
22
Aces
27
5
Double Faults
5
78%
(
62 of
80)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
59 of
74)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
33 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
42 of
121)
122
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(5) 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luke Bambridge
Player
Mateusz Terczynski
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Luke Bambridge
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
20 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gonzalo Escobar
Player
Luke Bambridge
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jared Hiltzik
Player
Luke Bambridge
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
91)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luke Bambridge
Player
Justin Boulais
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marinko Matosevic
Player
Luke Bambridge
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
46%
(
39 of
84)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Joshua Ward-Hibbert Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Joshua Ward-Hibbert
85%
(
52 of
61)
1st Serve %
71%
(
53 of
75)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Appelgren
Player
Joshua Ward-Hibbert
53%
(
51 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
62 of
98)
0
Aces
15
4
Double Faults
7
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
60%
(
27 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
98)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxim Dubarenco
Player
Joshua Ward-Hibbert
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
9
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
33 of
40)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
27 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mats Moraing
Player
Joshua Ward-Hibbert
51%
(
38 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
6
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joshua Ward-Hibbert
Player
Joshua Paris
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Hoyt
Player
Joshua Ward-Hibbert
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
13
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
5
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Dolezel
Player
Joshua Ward-Hibbert
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
50
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 2-3 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Bambridge Vs Ward-Hibbert Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
