Luka Talan Lopatic vs Biagio Gramaticopolo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 25 Sep at 08:12 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Talan Lopatic vs B. Gramaticopolo

SLO
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Lopatic 1 - 0 Gramaticopolo
They have played 2 sets in total, with Luka Talan Lopatic winning 2 and Biagio Gramaticopolo winning 0. The last match between Luka Talan Lopatic and Biagio Gramaticopolo was at the M15 Slovenj Gradec, 25-09-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Luka Talan Lopatic getting the victory 6-4 7-6(6).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lopatic | 1 |
| Gramaticopolo | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Slovenj Gradec(09-25-25)
L. T. Lopatic vs B. Gramaticopolo H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 44.19% (19-24) | Career Total W/L | 48.31% (57-61) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
L. T. Lopatic vs B. Gramaticopolo Match Preview:
- Second serve efficiency is a clear differentiator. Biagio Gramaticopolo has struggled, securing 0% of points, while Luka Talan Lopatic has captured 47.22% on their second serve. Could this reflect a critical edge in match predictions? Yes, given the high correlation to outcomes in their competitions.
- In return games, Lopatic shows superiority, with 45.59% success on opponents' second serves and 21.78% on first serve returns, compared to Gramaticopolo's 0% in both categories.
- Under pressure, Gramaticopolo falters, saving 0% of breakpoints. Conversely, Lopatic saves 50% of critical points, suggesting steadiness under pressure.
- Reviewing past year performances, Gramaticopolo edges ahead with a 58.82% win rate, while Lopatic has yet to win a match despite numerous attempts.
- On hard surfaces, Gramaticopolo's slight edge shows a 53% success rate over Lopatic's 50%. How significant is this in deciding a match on hard courts? It could be a minor advantage.
- Assessing competition levels, Gramaticopolo has faced stronger opponents, averaging a rank of 200.47, unlike Lopatic's average opponent rank of 366.
- When matches stretch to deciding sets, Gramaticopolo wins 50% of the time, whereas Lopatic falls short, winning none.
Editorial Prediction (September 25, 2025, UTC):
Reviewing recent performance data reveals significant distinctions between Biagio Gramaticopolo and Luka Talan Lopatic.
Luka Talan Lopatic's second serve and return game show clear advantages, with remarkable statistics that point towards higher match success predictions. Furthermore, his ability to maintain composure under pressure is indicated by his breakpoint-saving capabilities.
However, Biagio Gramaticopolo possesses a stronger track record over the past year and shows resilience in deciding sets, suggesting potential for competitiveness in tight matches.
Given these analyses, while Gramaticopolo brings certain strengths, the prediction leans towards Luka Talan Lopatic as the likely winner in this upcoming encounter, given his serving and return game prowess.
Luka Talan Lopatic vs Biagio Gramaticopolo Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. T. Lopatic vs B. Gramaticopolo H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:52:26 | Average Match Time | 1:52:26 |
| 67% (50/75) | 1st Serve % | 68% (52/77) |
| 76% (38/50) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (40/52) |
| 56% (14/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (11/25) |
| 29% (2/7) | Break Pts Won % | 17% (1/6) |
| 34% (26/77) | Return Points Win % | 31% (23/75) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. T. Lopatic Recent Matches Played
B. Gramaticopolo Recent Matches Played

L. T. Lopatic vs B. Gramaticopolo Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 44.19% (19/24) | YTD Win/Loss | 48.31% (57/61) |
| 47.06% (48/54) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.62% (130/132) |
| 48.42% (461/491) | Games Win/Loss | 49.52% (1236/1260) |
| 50.00% (11/11) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.78% (19/17) |
| 38.10% (8/13) | Clay Win/Loss | 47.95% (35/38) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (3/6) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 21 | Aces Total | 178 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 54 | Total Double Faults | 210 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 266.91 | Average Opponent Rank | 265 |
| 63% (647/1033) | 1st Serve % | 57% (2483/4379) |
| 60% (389/647) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (1649/2483) |
| 44% (170/386) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (886/1897) |
| 46% (40/87) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (152/360) |
| 38% (355/933) | Return Points Win % | 37% (1554/4234) |
| 44.19% (19/24) | Futures W/L | 48.31% (57/61) |
| 43% (18/42) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (57/117) |
| 60% (3/5) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (16/27) |
| 35% (6/17) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (11/27) |
| 67% (21/14) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (59/51) |
| 33% (21/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (59/8) |
| 23% (22/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (59/6) |