Luka Mikrut vs Corentin Denolly Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 28 Oct at 12:07 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Mikrut vs C. Denolly

CRO
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Mikrut 1 - 0 Denolly
They have played 2 sets in total, with Luka Mikrut winning 2 and Corentin Denolly winning 0. The last match between Luka Mikrut and Corentin Denolly was at the Monastir Challenger, 28-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Luka Mikrut getting the victory 6-0 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mikrut | 1 |
| Denolly | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Monastir Challenger(10-28-25)
L. Mikrut vs C. Denolly H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $3,200 | Career Prize Money | $56,935 |
| 63.00% (143-84) | Career Total W/L | 62.28% (431-261) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 8 | Titles | 13 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.00% (1-1) |
L. Mikrut vs C. Denolly Match Preview:
- Corentin Denolly has secured 42.34% of second serve points in recent months, slightly behind Luka Mikrut who has 44.52%. Could this slight edge help Mikrut win? It's an open question.
- When looking at return game stats, Denolly appears stronger, having captured 49.61% of his opponent's second serve points, compared to Mikrut's 46.41%.
- For first serve return points, Denolly also leads with 30.17% against Mikrut's 25.85%. Is this Denolly's key advantage?
- Under pressure, Mikrut is slightly more resilient, saving 54.01% of breakpoints against Denolly's 49.68%.
- Throughout the past year, Denolly holds a win percentage of 51.67%, while Mikrut has outperformed significantly with 73.08%.
- On their preferred surfaces, both players have a 66% win rate, Denolly excelling on clay and Mikrut on hard courts. Could surface preference influence their performance here?
- Comparing player levels, Denolly has struggled in higher-level tournaments, winning only 38.24% in Challengers/ITF, whereas Mikrut has won 66.67% at similar levels.
- Despite playing against relatively stronger opponents (average rank of 328.27), Denolly's performance in deciding sets is better at 61% compared to Mikrut's 55%.
- Look into their performances at the current event for sharper predictions, as some players excel in particular tournaments.
Editorial Prediction (October 28, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the current form, Luka Mikrut demonstrates a slight edge in second serve efficiency, although Corentin Denolly shows stronger return game statistics. This could lead to a competitive matchup, with Denolly potentially taking the advantage in return games.
Mikrut showcases greater resilience under pressure with a higher breakpoint save percentage, which could be pivotal in critical moments of the match. However, Denolly's superior performance in deciding sets may favor him if the match goes the distance.
Overall, Mikrut's higher win percentage over the past year and better results in challenging tournament settings suggest he is more likely to claim victory. Despite Denolly's strengths, Mikrut's overall form and mental toughness under pressure place him as the favorite for this match.
Luka Mikrut vs Corentin Denolly Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Mikrut vs C. Denolly H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 1 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 0:58:47 | Average Match Time | 0:58:47 |
| 66% (23/35) | 1st Serve % | 61% (30/49) |
| 96% (22/23) | 1st Serve Win % | 47% (14/30) |
| 50% (6/12) | 2nd Serve Win % | 32% (6/19) |
| 42% (5/12) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (29/49) | Return Points Win % | 20% (7/35) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Mikrut Recent Matches Played
C. Denolly Recent Matches Played

L. Mikrut vs C. Denolly Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.00% (143/84) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.28% (431/261) |
| 60.50% (314/205) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.73% (942/635) |
| 54.08% (2629/2232) | Games Win/Loss | 53.81% (7899/6781) |
| 65.71% (23/12) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.45% (61/49) |
| 63.78% (118/67) | Clay Win/Loss | 65.55% (312/164) |
| 28.57% (2/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55.24% (58/47) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 745 | Aces Total | 2070 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 388 | Total Double Faults | 2021 |
| 1:39:39 | Average Match Time | 1:27:19 |
| 426.77 | Average Opponent Rank | 507.1 |
| 58% (8539/14670) | 1st Serve % | 65% (27904/42909) |
| 70% (5944/8539) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (18746/27904) |
| 50% (3052/6131) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (7296/15006) |
| 43% (708/1641) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (2204/4870) |
| 42% (6200/14739) | Return Points Win % | 43% (18571/43547) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Main Tour W/L | 60.00% (3/2) |
| 60.49% (49/32) | Challenger W/L | 42.75% (56/75) |
| 65.03% (93/50) | Futures W/L | 67.15% (370/181) |
| 63% (142/225) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (427/682) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 58% (37/64) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (106/189) |
| 57% (38/67) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (118/201) |
| 91% (129/118) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (416/375) |
| 9% (129/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (416/41) |
| 26% (98/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (276/56) |