Luca Nardi vs Andrea Pellegrino Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second serve performance is nearly identical, with Nardi winning 44.92% and Pellegrino 44.7% of points. Does this slight difference offer an edge? In match predictions, even minor statistical advantages can be telling.
• Nardi excels in returning second serves, securing 45.25% compared to Pellegrino's 41.06%. Will this give Nardi the upper hand in pressuring Pellegrino's serve?
• Pellegrino is better at first serve returns, winning 30.63% to Nardi's 23.57%. Can Pellegrino leverage this strength to compensate for his second serve return deficit?
• Under pressure, Nardi has a breakpoint save rate of 56.37%, while Pellegrino saves 50.74%. More successful breakpoint saves could sway the match in Nardi's favor.
• Though marketing a slight disparity, Pellegrino's win percentage over the last year is higher (57.81%) than Nardi's (52.94%). Does this indicate a better overall performance streak?
• Nardi performs best on hard surfaces with a 59% win rate, while Pellegrino's strength is on clay with 56% wins. Will the match's surface influence the outcome?
• In similar tournament levels, Nardi has a slightly better success rate at Challengers/ITF events (68.57%) compared to Pellegrino (61.02%). Is Nardi's current form at these events a potential advantage?
• The level of competition faced varies as Nardi's opponents have an average rank of 188.9, whereas Pellegrino's average opponent is ranked 257.47. Does this suggest Nardi is more battle-tested?
• In deciding sets, Pellegrino demonstrates a commanding win rate of 76%, surpassing Nardi's 50%. Could this be critical if the match goes the distance?
• Breakpoint conversion indicates Pellegrino converts these chances more effectively at 31.72% compared to Nardi's 27.23%. Could this efficiency be the key to victory?

Editorial Prediction (June 14, 2025, UTC):

Considering the statistical insights, Pellegrino may have the edge with a stronger overall win rate and superior performance in deciding sets, an asset in close matches.

However, Nardi's higher success against tougher opponents and better second serve return percentage present significant competitive advantages.

The surface of play will be a decisive factor; Nardi excels on hard courts, while Pellegrino favors clay, potentially impacting the outcome depending on the conditions.

In conclusion, while both players show strengths in different areas, Pellegrino's better deciding set record and breakpoint conversion could give him a slight edge to claim victory in this matchup.