Luca Castagnola vs Dragos Nicolae Cazacu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 02 Jun at 11:28 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Castagnola vs D. Nicolae Cazacu

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ROU
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Castagnola 1 - 0 Cazacu
They have played 2 sets in total, with Luca Castagnola winning 2 and Dragos Nicolae Cazacu winning 0. The last match between Luca Castagnola and Dragos Nicolae Cazacu was at the M15 Ljubljana, 03-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Luca Castagnola getting the victory 6-4 7-6(5).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Castagnola | 1 |
| Cazacu | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Ljubljana(06-03-25)
L. Castagnola vs D. N. Cazacu H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 54.76% (184-152) | Career Total W/L | 47.73% (84-92) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
L. Castagnola vs D. N. Cazacu Match Preview:
- When examining second serve effectiveness, Castagnola outperforms, securing 46.44% of points compared to Cazacu's 40.47%.
- Considering return games, Cazacu has a slight edge, winning 53.97% of opponents' second serve points, while Castagnola achieves 48.7%.
- For first serve return points, Cazacu again leads with 34.86% compared to Castagnola's 33.02% success rate.
- Under pressure, Castagnola demonstrates stronger play, saving 57.14% of breakpoints, whereas Cazacu manages to save 48.2%.
- Castagnola has shown a slightly better match win rate at 49.18% over the past year, juxtaposed with Cazacu's 47.62%.
- Hard courts are Castagnola's forte, winning 59% of matches, while Cazacu boasts only a 20% win rate on the same surface.
- Both players primarily compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, with Castagnola winning 51.06% of matches and Cazacu claiming 48.28%.
- Quality of opponents gives Cazacu a slight advantage, having faced higher-ranked players with an average rank of 370.24 compared to Castagnola's 424.51.
- Deciding set performance is equal, as both players win 38% of their deciding sets.
- In terms of break point conversion, Cazacu proves more effective with a conversion rate of 45.09%, surpassing Castagnola's 37.5%.
Editorial Prediction (June 2, 2025, UTC):
While both Castagnola and Cazacu have shown competitive performances, specific strengths and weaknesses set them apart. Castagnola's second serve performance and breakpoint saving abilities stand out, indicating proficiency under pressure. Moreover, Castagnola's experience and success on hard courts suggest an edge, especially if the match is played on this surface.
Conversely, Cazacu exhibits stronger return game statistics and a higher breakpoint conversion rate, offering a tactical advantage. Facing tougher opponents may have prepared Cazacu for challenging matches, possibly enhancing resilience.
Despite Cazacu's strengths, Castagnola's overall steadiness and slight superiority in match winning percentages could tip the scales in his favor. Therefore, Castagnola appears more likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming encounter.
Luca Castagnola vs Dragos Nicolae Cazacu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Castagnola vs D. N. Cazacu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:22:38 | Average Match Time | 2:22:38 |
| 73% (51/70) | 1st Serve % | 59% (46/78) |
| 61% (31/51) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (29/46) |
| 58% (11/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (12/32) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Pts Won % | 75% (3/4) |
| 47% (37/78) | Return Points Win % | 40% (28/70) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Castagnola Recent Matches Played
D. N. Cazacu Recent Matches Played

L. Castagnola vs D. N. Cazacu Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.76% (184/152) | YTD Win/Loss | 47.73% (84/92) |
| 54.28% (425/358) | Sets Win/Loss | 48.25% (193/207) |
| 52.00% (3926/3624) | Games Win/Loss | 49.33% (1864/1915) |
| 57.27% (63/47) | Hard Win/Loss | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 53.52% (114/99) | Clay Win/Loss | 48.52% (82/87) |
| 53.85% (7/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 227 | Aces Total | 177 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 828 | Total Double Faults | 370 |
| 1:18:52 | Average Match Time | 1:31:55 |
| 372.84 | Average Opponent Rank | 342.1 |
| 67% (10798/16068) | 1st Serve % | 62% (6073/9768) |
| 61% (6620/10798) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (3658/6073) |
| 47% (2499/5270) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1710/3695) |
| 48% (863/1789) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (472/1066) |
| 43% (7004/16126) | Return Points Win % | 43% (4094/9624) |
| 32.61% (15/31) | Challenger W/L | 27.27% (3/8) |
| 58.28% (169/121) | Futures W/L | 49.09% (81/84) |
| 54% (177/326) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (83/173) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 45% (37/83) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (18/38) |
| 46% (53/115) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (24/49) |
| 83% (182/151) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (77/70) |
| 17% (182/31) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (77/7) |
| 21% (154/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (99/14) |