Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Louisa Chirico vs Timea Bacsinszky Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chirico vs Bacsinszky analysis and find out who is favored!
Louisa Chirico vs Timea Bacsinszky Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chirico has won 47.61% of points on his second serve, while Bacsinszky has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chirico, in recent form, has won 57.46% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bacsinszky has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.19% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chirico has saved 54.13% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bacsinszky has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chirico has won 54.69% of matches played (W/L 35/ 29), with Bacsinszky winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chirico has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 149/ 92), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 5/ 7). Bacsinszky has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 69% (W/L 198/ 90), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 111/ 87).
- Player level: In the last year, Chirico has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.69% of matches (W/L 30/ 22), where as Bacsinszky has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chirico winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Chirico winning 2 and Bacsinszky winning 0. The last match between Chirico and Bacsinszky was at the Wuhan Tennis Open - Wuhan, 25-09-2016, First, Hard with Louisa Chirico getting the victory 1100038405.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:21:51.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chirico and Bacsinszky have played a deciding set 0 times, with Chirico winning 0 times and Bacsinszky 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Chirico winning 0, and Bacsinszky 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chirico has played against opponents with an average rank of 221.7 while Bacsinszky has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chirico has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bacsinszky has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chirico has converted 51.64% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bacsinszky has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Chirico 1 - 0 Bacsinszky
222
Rank
58
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
9
High
34
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
56% (297-231)
Career Total W/L
62% (409-247)
56% (14-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$623,285
Career Prize Money
$4,467,520
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Chirico VS Bacsinszky H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Louisa Chirico | Timea Bacsinszky |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 10 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:21:51 | 1:21:51 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (27/49) | 57% (29/51) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (17/27) | 69% (20/29) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (12/22) | 27% (6/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 67% (2/3) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (25/51) | 41% (20/49) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Chirico VS Bacsinszky H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 4-3 ret. |
Stats 
Louisa Chirico
Player
Timea Bacsinszky
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
54
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Louisa Chirico | Timea Bacsinszky |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (14/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (31/25) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (283/257) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 62% (13/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 53 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.41 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 108 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:44 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 218.12 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1158/1847) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (702/1158) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (328/689) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (110/213) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (814/1772) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 58% (14/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 54% (13/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (15/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (15/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Louisa Chirico Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Louisa Chirico
60%
(
53 of
88)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Emily Appleton
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Valentini Grammatikopoulou
60%
(
56 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
40 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Kayla Day
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
46%
(
35 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
77
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Maya Joint
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
74%
(
58 of
78)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Valentini Grammatikopoulou
62%
(
69 of
111)
1st Serve %
80%
(
81 of
101)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
44 of
81)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
46%
(
51 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
52 of
101)
112
Total Points Won
100
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Allie Kiick
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve %
50%
(
3 of
6)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
8 of
12)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
14
Total Points Won
8
|
2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Ashton Bowers
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
49%
(
28 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashton Bowers
Player
Louisa Chirico
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
13
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Simona Waltert
Player
Louisa Chirico
74%
(
78 of
105)
1st Serve %
67%
(
80 of
120)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
44 of
80)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
44%
(
46 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
58 of
120)
117
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
view more
Timea Bacsinszky Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kristie Ahn
Player
Timea Bacsinszky
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
14 of
22)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caty McNally
Player
Timea Bacsinszky
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Timea Bacsinszky
71%
(
68 of
96)
1st Serve %
65%
(
69 of
106)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
38 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
54 of
106)
112
Total Points Won
90
|
6-2 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kurumi Nara
Player
Timea Bacsinszky
71%
(
80 of
113)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
99)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
51%
(
41 of
80)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
67%
(
10 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
50%
(
57 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
56 of
99)
112
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 6-7(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sloane Stephens
Player
Timea Bacsinszky
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktorija Golubic
Player
Timea Bacsinszky
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
97)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Timea Bacsinszky
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
80)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
52%
(
38 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Timea Bacsinszky
Player
Nao Hibino
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timea Bacsinszky
Player
Anna Tatishvili
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Kurumi Nara
Player
Timea Bacsinszky
83%
(
74 of
89)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
88)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Chirico Vs Bacsinszky Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
