Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Louisa Chirico vs Makenna Jones Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chirico vs Jones analysis and find out who is favored!
Louisa Chirico vs Makenna Jones Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chirico has won 46.18% of points on his second serve, while Jones has won 45%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chirico, in recent form, has won 54.18% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jones has won 64.6%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.52% and 37.35% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chirico has saved 48.96% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jones has saved 62.9% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chirico has won 48.33% of matches played (W/L 29/ 31), with Jones winning 58.7% (W/L 27/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chirico has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 142/ 91), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 5/ 7). Jones has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 54/ 32), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Chirico has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 24/ 24), where as Jones has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 27/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Chirico winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Chirico winning 4 and Jones winning 0. The last match between Chirico and Jones was at the W60 Rancho Santa Fe, 12-10-2023, Second, Hard with Louisa Chirico getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:41:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chirico and Jones have played a deciding set 0 times, with Chirico winning 0 times and Jones 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Chirico winning 1, and Jones 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chirico has played against opponents with an average rank of 232.77 while Jones has played against players with an average rank of 248.63.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chirico has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jones has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chirico has converted 47.28% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jones has converted 56.1% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Chirico 2 - 0 Jones
284
Rank
58
High
27
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
261
Rank
236
High
26
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
56% (290-230)
Career Total W/L
62% (94-57)
41% (7-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$623,285
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Louisa Chirico | Makenna Jones |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 26 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 10 | 14 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:0 | 1:41:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (89/142) | 61% (80/132) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (61/89) | 54% (43/80) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (21/53) | 40% (21/52) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (10/18) | 46% (6/13) |
| Return Points W% | 52% (68/132) | 42% (60/142) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Louisa Chirico
Player
Makenna Jones
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
6
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
9
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
29 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| 6-2 7-6(5) |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Makenna Jones
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Louisa Chirico | Makenna Jones |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 41% (7/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 44% (17/22) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (190/196) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 46% (6/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.19 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 36 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.42 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 78 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:54 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 209.18 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (811/1287) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (482/811) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (229/476) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (68/137) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (544/1248) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 44% (7/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (7/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (8/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Louisa Chirico Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ashton Bowers
Player
Louisa Chirico
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
13
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Simona Waltert
Player
Louisa Chirico
74%
(
78 of
105)
1st Serve %
67%
(
80 of
120)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
44 of
80)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
44%
(
46 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
58 of
120)
117
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Louisa Chirico
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
20%
(
4 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Maria Bondarenko
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Louisa Chirico
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
50%
(
21 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jessika Ponchet
Player
Louisa Chirico
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maribella Zamarripa
Player
Louisa Chirico
73%
(
84 of
115)
1st Serve %
58%
(
63 of
109)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
45 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
109)
119
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(4) 7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Montgomery
Player
Louisa Chirico
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Ava Markham
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuliia Starodubtseva
Player
Louisa Chirico
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
72%
(
43 of
60)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Makenna Jones Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Makenna Jones
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
14%
(
2 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
49%
(
28 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
61
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-6 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Makenna Jones
Player
Camilla Bossi
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ekaterine Gorgodze
Player
Makenna Jones
78%
(
72 of
92)
1st Serve %
66%
(
79 of
120)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
38%
(
8 of
21)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
43 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
61 of
120)
110
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Panna Udvardy
Player
Makenna Jones
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Taylor Townsend
Player
Makenna Jones
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Makenna Jones
Player
Ann Li
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Makenna Jones
Player
Grace Min
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
75%
(
58 of
77)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
0
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
37 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Makenna Jones
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
6
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
9
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
29 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Makenna Jones
Player
Fangran Tian
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
93)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
49 of
93)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jessie Aney
Player
Makenna Jones
52%
(
40 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
95)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
35%
(
13 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
48%
(
37 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
95)
88
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Chirico Vs Jones Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
