Louisa Chirico vs Erika Andreeva Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In recent months, the performance of Andreeva and Chirico on their second serve shows some noticeable differences. Andreeva has secured 45.23% of points, while Chirico trails with 40.31%. Such statistics have shown a high correlation with match prediction accuracy. Additionally, in terms of return game stats, Andreeva has claimed 46.98% of her opponent's second serve points, whereas Chirico has a slightly superior return rate of 51.85%. When examining returns on first serves, Andreeva has captured 31.69% of points, while Chirico has a marginally better record of 32.8%. These figures play a pivotal role in determining who might have the edge in their head-to-head matchup.

The analysis of their performance under pressure further highlights key differences. Andreeva has managed to save 56.56% of breakpoints when faced with challenges, contrasting with Chirico's 45.66%. Such data is invaluable for those placing in-game bets. Over the past year, when it comes to match results, Andreeva has emerged victorious in 48.08% of her contests, exhibiting a win-loss record of 25 out of 52 matches. In comparison, Chirico has a superior win percentage of 55.07%, having won 38 out of 69 matches.

Looking at their surface preferences, Andreeva thrives on indoor hard courts, boasting a 67% win ratio, whereas her success dwindles on grass with a 56% win-loss record. On the other hand, Chirico shows a preference for clay, winning 62% of her matches, while she's least effective on grass with a 38% win ratio. The level of competition they've faced also varies. Over the past year, Andreeva mainly competed on the main tour, winning 40% of her matches, while Chirico has largely participated in Challengers/ITF tournaments, with a winning percentage of 59.62%.

When considering the quality of opponents, Andreeva has faced a higher average opponent rank of 130.9 compared to Chirico’s 287.83. In deciding set scenarios, Andreeva has a slight edge, having won 44% of such sets, compared to Chirico's 41%. This statistic might be vital for live match predictions and betting. Finally, when it comes to break point conversion, Andreeva has successfully converted 34.07% of her chances, whereas Chirico has a higher conversion rate of 38.36%. This disparity may influence outcomes during crucial breakpoint moments.

Analyzing these performance metrics, Chirico appears to have a slight advantage overall. Her superior win rate across various statistics suggests that Chirico is more likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming match.