Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Louis Cant vs Kimmer Coppejans Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cant vs Coppejans analysis and find out who is favored!
Louis Cant vs Kimmer Coppejans Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cant has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Coppejans has won 46.53%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cant, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Coppejans has won 53.72%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 27.24% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cant has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Coppejans has saved 60.61% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cant has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Coppejans winning 52.5% (W/L 21/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cant has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 100% (W/L 2/ 0), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 32/ 32). Coppejans has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 292/ 190), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Cant winning 2 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Cant winning 4 and Coppejans winning 3. The last match between Cant and Coppejans was at the Belgium F9, 12-08-2013, Second, Clay with Louis Cant getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cant and Coppejans have played a deciding set 1 times, with Cant winning 1 times and Coppejans 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Cant winning 0, and Coppejans 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cant has played against opponents with an average rank of while Coppejans has played against players with an average rank of 246.93.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cant has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Coppejans has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cant has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Coppejans has converted 25% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cant 2 - 1 Coppejans
Ret.
Rank
High
33
Age
Plays
2
Total1
0
Hard0
2
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
250
Rank
97
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
51% (36-34)
Career Total W/L
57% (418-314)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
50% (2-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$294,830
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Louis Cant | Kimmer Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 3 |
| Games Won | 38 | 26 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-5 | |||||
| 6-4 7-6(3) | |||||
| 6-0 3-6 6-0 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Louis Cant | Kimmer Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (4/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 48% (45/48) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.37 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 17 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:54:12 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 250.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 61% (174/286) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 72% (125/174) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (54/112) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 23% (8/35) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (119/327) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/2) |
Louis Cant Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 4-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 3-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Kimmer Coppejans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats 
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
55%
(
65 of
119)
1st Serve %
68%
(
89 of
131)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
61 of
89)
50%
(
27 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
42 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
52 of
131)
129
Total Points Won
121
|
6-7(1) 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
80%
(
36 of
45)
10
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Lucas Poullain
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
96)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
50%
(
18 of
36)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
17 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
39
Total Points Won
37
|
4-6 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
88)
6
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
12
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
96%
(
25 of
26)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
9 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
14 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
69%
(
79 of
115)
1st Serve %
67%
(
80 of
119)
10
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
59 of
80)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
36%
(
41 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
119)
115
Total Points Won
119
|
7-6(8) 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Titouan Droguet
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
14
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Cant Vs Coppejans Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
